Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify types of array/slice and array/base/slice via use of generic type parameter #1318
Simplify types of array/slice and array/base/slice via use of generic type parameter #1318
Changes from 2 commits
3c06d16
7ab004b
e572eb0
0067d03
e1d0be8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to use the
interface
approach I mentioned previously, or should we be content with typing like this? Atm, this will return incorrect results for specialized constructors having aslice
method which are not captured byTypedArray | ComplexTypedArray
. Granted, the previous declarations also did not capture this case, but we could go ahead and correct here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kgryte We should merge this PR without the proposed change as I am not getting it to work properly with tuple types. Have some work-in-progress stuff we can discuss but this is quite complicated and would also require some opaque typing, I believe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay. We should create a TODO to follow-up.