Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(picker-starter): add giget instruction #90

Conversation

demetriusfeijoo
Copy link
Contributor

Issue: EXT-2143

What?

Add giget instruction on README.

Why?

Using Giget will make developer's lives easier since it will not require them to clone all this repositories and then, after, clean up the other projects they don't want from it.

[View Rendered →]

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
code-block ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 3, 2024 3:31pm

@demetriusfeijoo demetriusfeijoo marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2024 22:40
yarn build

# Deploy it using the CLI
npx @storyblok/field-plugin-cli@latest deploy
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already have deploy command in scripts of package.json. Why don't we put it here like yarn deploy?

Btw, I've check the package.json and

    "deploy": "npm run build && npx @storyblok/field-plugin-cli@latest deploy --name sb-picker-starter --scope partner-portal"

We should probably remove --name sb-picker-starter --scope partner-portal. What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried to keep the package.json file unchanged to avoid the need to modify also the workflows/picker-starter.yml, but since you mentioned it, I think it will be better to move these options from the deploy script to the workflow.

I did it here

Thanks for your suggestion, @eunjae-lee.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@demetriusfeijoo ah that's why. yeah, now that parameters live on this root level of this repository, and the cloned project will no longer have sb-picker-starter stuff. Looks great! :D

Copy link
Contributor

@eunjae-lee eunjae-lee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've left a comment but it isn't blocking the merge. Looks good!

@demetriusfeijoo demetriusfeijoo force-pushed the EXT-2143-add-readme-instruction-to-fetch-this-starter-using-giget branch from d40f8a0 to dcc2fc4 Compare January 3, 2024 15:31
@demetriusfeijoo demetriusfeijoo merged commit 558bc4b into main Jan 3, 2024
4 checks passed
@demetriusfeijoo demetriusfeijoo deleted the EXT-2143-add-readme-instruction-to-fetch-this-starter-using-giget branch January 3, 2024 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants