Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: Cosmetic fixes #141

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

style: Cosmetic fixes #141

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

kare
Copy link
Contributor

@kare kare commented Sep 3, 2021

  • Add chainlink_cofig/tempkeys to .gitignore
  • Unify chainlink naming

@kare kare changed the title Remove duplicate definition style: Cosmetic fixes Sep 3, 2021
@kare kare requested a review from samt1803 September 3, 2021 15:40
Copy link
Contributor

@samt1803 samt1803 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removing the keys might break things, I will try to test this today, a better fix might be to rename tempkeys to keys.

@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ data/
.idea
.env
certs/
/chainlink_config/tempkeys
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removing these keys ( - I think, didn't test ist recently - ) might result in the chainlink node creating new ones, so it probably will not work with the preloaded addresses on the sidechain. The chainlink node wont have any funds on its new address and then can't create transactions. Unless these keys are also in the database file, shared to the chainlink container, then it might still work without these key files.
The crosschain chainlink e2e workflow needs to be tested without these files before removing them, I will try to do this today before my holiday...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@samt1803 This isn't urgent, just like the title says

@samt1803 samt1803 self-requested a review September 6, 2021 09:14
Copy link
Contributor

@samt1803 samt1803 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes currently break the chainlink workflow. https://linear.app/streamr/issue/ETH-155 needs to be done first, then this PR can be revisited.
(The workflow also needs to be run in an integrationtest by the github CI: the ticket is, https://linear.app/streamr/issue/ETH-137)

@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ services:
timeout: 10s
retries: 60
chainlink-external-adapter:
container_name: streamr-dev-chainlink-adapter
container_name: streamr-dev-chainlink-external-adapter
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this breaks the chainlink workflow because it is linked directly to the container, instead of 10.200.10.1. I created a ticket to fix this: https://linear.app/streamr/issue/ETH-155

@kare
Copy link
Contributor Author

kare commented Sep 8, 2021

@samt1803 I've merged duplicate definition fix in PR #145

Let's solve these minor chainlink issues on a later date.

@kare kare marked this pull request as draft September 8, 2021 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants