Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2022. It is now read-only.

Add Sentry feature (via wp-sentry plugin) #104

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lusimeon
Copy link
Contributor

@lusimeon lusimeon commented May 9, 2022

Add the plugin wp-sentry in SAO.

This plugin add the ability to configure Sentry integration (Issues and Performance), see plugin for more informations.

@lusimeon lusimeon requested a review from a team May 9, 2022 14:43
@lusimeon lusimeon force-pushed the feature/sentry-plugin branch 2 times, most recently from 7a0ee56 to becf609 Compare May 9, 2022 15:24
@perruche
Copy link
Contributor

perruche commented May 9, 2022

👏 Nice addition

Copy link
Collaborator

@titouanmathis titouanmathis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice addition @lusimeon!

Could you also update the version of Node.js from 12 to 16 used by the GitHub Actions ? This should fix the failing test.

template/.env.example Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Lucas Simeon added 2 commits May 13, 2022 12:09
Add the plugin https://github.com/stayallive/wp-sentry in SAO and configure constants
Fix `??` syntax error during pipeline
@lusimeon lusimeon force-pushed the feature/sentry-plugin branch from becf609 to 02e28da Compare May 13, 2022 10:09
@lusimeon lusimeon requested a review from titouanmathis May 13, 2022 10:12
Copy link
Collaborator

@titouanmathis titouanmathis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's get this merged! 👍

@lusimeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

#106 rework project structure, so wait #106 to be merged before merging this one.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants