Skip to content

fix: handle satisfies keyword for vite.addPlugin #653

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jycouet
Copy link
Contributor

@jycouet jycouet commented Jul 28, 2025

closes #652

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 28, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 234c12c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
sv Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npx https://pkg.pr.new/sveltejs/cli/sv@653
npx https://pkg.pr.new/sveltejs/cli/svelte-migrate@653

commit: 435eed7

Copy link
Member

@manuel3108 manuel3108 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are absolutely crazy! Get some sleep 😆


// Handle wrapper functions (e.g., defineConfig({})) if ignoreWrapper is specified
let configObject: AstTypes.ObjectExpression;

// Handle TypeScript satisfies expressions
let rootObject = _rootObject;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Having rootObject and _rootObject seems unintuitive, Why not change the const to a let above? or find a better name

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that I prefer to keep const and we don't want to change it after.
But, you are right, the way done today is not perfect ;)

I'll push something

@jycouet jycouet requested a review from manuel3108 July 29, 2025 05:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unable to add Vitest
2 participants