Skip to content

[Templating] Adding AssetMapper to asset() function #21132

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2025

Conversation

ThomasLandauer
Copy link
Contributor

Page: https://symfony.com/doc/6.4/templates.html#linking-to-css-javascript-and-image-assets

There is another link to AssetMapper just one screen further down - maybe you want to merge them somehow: https://symfony.com/doc/6.4/templates.html#build-versioning-more-advanced-css-javascript-and-image-handling

My point here is that the main advantage of the asset() function IMO is not the subdirectory scenario, but rather: If you later switch to AssetMapper, it saves you a lot of time if you've already used asset() everywhere.

Page: https://symfony.com/doc/6.4/templates.html#linking-to-css-javascript-and-image-assets

There is another link to AssetMapper just one screen further down - maybe you want to merge them somehow: https://symfony.com/doc/6.4/templates.html#build-versioning-more-advanced-css-javascript-and-image-handling

My point here is that the main advantage of the `asset()` function IMO is not the subdirectory scenario, but rather: If you *later* switch to AssetMapper, it saves you a lot of time if you've already used `asset()` everywhere.
@carsonbot carsonbot added this to the 6.4 milestone Jun 24, 2025
@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz merged commit a5d5b4e into symfony:6.4 Jul 4, 2025
3 checks passed
@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

Thomas, thanks for this contribution. I like this proposal and while merging, I added some more docs on top of your changes. See bb3f806

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants