[WIP] Add LostandFound page #100
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes include the addition of an authorization check in the existing Vue component Changes
Security Recommendations
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🔇 Additional comments (3)frontend/pages/a/[id].vue (1)Line range hint The component correctly uses the auth middleware, but we should verify its configuration. ✅ Verification successfulLet me analyze the auth middleware implementation and check for any potential security concerns. ✅ Auth middleware is properly configured with secure implementation The auth middleware implementation is secure with:
Security recommendations:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check auth middleware implementation and configuration
echo "Checking auth middleware configuration..."
fd -e ts -e js -e vue middleware | xargs rg -l "auth"
# Check for other routes that might bypass authentication
echo "Checking for potential auth bypass routes..."
fd -e vue pages | xargs rg -l "isAuthorized"
Length of output: 3439 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check auth middleware implementation
echo "Checking auth middleware implementation..."
cat frontend/middleware/auth.ts
# Check auth context implementation
echo "Checking auth context implementation..."
cat frontend/composables/use-auth-context.ts
# Check if there are any routes without auth middleware
echo "Checking routes without auth middleware..."
fd -e vue pages | xargs rg -L "middleware.*auth"
Length of output: 5152 frontend/pages/lostandfound.vue (2)
The scoped styles are well-organized and follow Vue best practices.
Remove duplicate template tag The template tag is unnecessarily duplicated. -<template>
<div class="lost-and-found">
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@philcunliffe - Very much a PoC / rough WIP at the moment, but hopefully start getting somewhere with this :) |
Deploying homebox-docs with
|
| Latest commit: |
42a1c7f
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://79c2dff2.homebox-docs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://katos-lost-item-page.homebox-docs.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
frontend/pages/a/[id].vue (1)
Line range hint
13-15: Review permanent redirect usageThe use of a 301 (permanent) redirect for asset navigation might cause browsers to cache the redirect. Consider using 302 (temporary) redirect for dynamic asset URLs.
-await navigateTo("/assets/" + assetId.value, { replace: true, redirectCode: 301 }); +await navigateTo("/assets/" + assetId.value, { replace: true, redirectCode: 302 });frontend/pages/lostandfound.vue (1)
1-79: Security RecommendationsPlease consider implementing the following security measures:
- Add rate limiting to prevent abuse of the lost and found page
- Implement CSRF protection for the form submissions
- Add input validation for any user-supplied data
- Consider implementing a CAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse
- Add logging for security monitoring
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these security measures?
🛑 Comments failed to post (6)
frontend/pages/a/[id].vue (1)
6-10:
⚠️ Potential issueConsider security implications of error messaging and redirect flow
The current implementation has several security considerations:
- The error message explicitly reveals the authentication state, which could be exploited for user enumeration.
- The error toast followed by redirect creates a noticeable delay that could be used for timing attacks.
- There's no rate limiting on redirects, potentially allowing abuse.
Consider applying these security-focused changes:
-if (!ctx.isAuthorized()) { - toast.error("User is not logged in"); - navigateTo("/lostandfound"); - return; -} +if (!ctx.isAuthorized()) { + // Use a generic message that doesn't reveal auth state + toast.info("Redirecting to Lost and Found"); + return navigateTo("/lostandfound", { + // Use temporary redirect for unauthenticated access + redirectCode: 302 + }); +}Consider implementing:
- Rate limiting on the redirect endpoint
- Logging of redirect attempts for security monitoring
- Adding HTTP security headers to prevent clickjacking
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!ctx.isAuthorized()) { // Use a generic message that doesn't reveal auth state toast.info("Redirecting to Lost and Found"); return navigateTo("/lostandfound", { // Use temporary redirect for unauthenticated access redirectCode: 302 }); }frontend/pages/lostandfound.vue (5)
2-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused imports and initializations
The
statCardData,itemsTableimports and their initializations are not being used in the component.-import { statCardData } from "./statistics"; -import { itemsTable } from "./table"; import { useLabelStore } from "~~/stores/labels"; import { useLocationStore } from "~~/stores/locations"; -const itemTable = itemsTable(api); -const stats = statCardData(api);Also applies to: 23-24
79-79:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove extra closing template tag
There's an extra closing template tag that should be removed.
-</template>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
7-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove auth middleware to allow public access
The auth middleware contradicts the PR objective of allowing non-logged-in users to access the Lost and Found page via QR codes.
definePageMeta({ - middleware: ["auth"], });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.definePageMeta({ });
38-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to use Composition API consistently and secure email configuration
- The component mixes Options API with Composition API
- Email should be stored in environment variables for security and maintainability
-<script> -export default { - name: 'LostAndFound', - data() { - return { - ownerEmail: '[email protected]' - }; - } -}; -</script> +<script setup lang="ts"> +// Move this to the existing script setup section +const ownerEmail = computed(() => process.env.CONTACT_EMAIL || '[email protected]');Also, add to your
.envfile:Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
30-34: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility and security
- Add proper ARIA labels for accessibility
- Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to external links
- Consider moving the email to a configuration file
- <h1>Lost and Found</h1> - <p>You have located an item that may be lost. Please contact the owner here: <a :href="'mailto:' + ownerEmail">{{ ownerEmail }}</a></p> - <div class="login-option"> - <p>Do you own this item? <router-link to="/login">Login to view or edit.</router-link></p> + <h1 role="heading" aria-level="1">Lost and Found</h1> + <p>You have located an item that may be lost. Please contact the owner here: + <a :href="'mailto:' + ownerEmail" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-label="Contact owner email">{{ ownerEmail }}</a> + </p> + <div class="login-option" role="complementary"> + <p>Do you own this item? <router-link to="/login" aria-label="Login to view or edit item">Login to view or edit.</router-link></p>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add a page for lost and found in the event that an item is accessed without the user being logged in. This means that if a QR is scanned and the user context isn't logged in, then the lost and found page will be shown.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
#13
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes