fix(backend): assetID incorrectly made 32 bit

[tankerkiller125]

What type of PR is this?

• bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Fixes the incorrect change made that caused assetIDs to be parsed as 32 bit, instead of the 64 bit allowed.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #60

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved handling of large asset IDs by modifying the data type to support larger values.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The primary change in this update involves modifying the data type of assetID from int32 to int64 in the HandleAssetGet method of the V1Controller struct. This change ensures compatibility with databases storing asset IDs as 64-bit integers, preventing errors during asset retrieval.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
backend/app/api/handlers/v1/...	Modified the data type of assetID from int32 to int64 in strconv.ParseInt call.

Sequence Diagram(s)

The changes are straightforward and do not involve complex new interactions or control flows, thus no sequence diagrams are necessary.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective / Issue(#)	Addressed	Explanation
Modify data type of assetID to int64 to maintain database compatibility (#60)	✅

Poem

The asset IDs now have grown,
From thirty-two to sixty-four, they've flown.
Errors begone, it's smooth and bright,
Database calls now work just right.
With changes small, big impacts lie,
The system’s robust, reaching the sky! 🚀

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

backend/app/api/handlers/v1/v1_ctrl_assets.go (1)

Line range hint 55-55: Address potential data loss during integer conversion.

Sir, it appears there's a slight oversight in your code. You're converting a 64-bit integer to a 32-bit integer without an upper bound check, which could lead to unexpected behavior or data loss if the values exceed the range of 32-bit integers.

- page, err = strconv.ParseInt(pageParam, 10, 32)
- pageSize, err = strconv.ParseInt(pageSizeParam, 10, 32)
+ page, err = strconv.ParseInt(pageParam, 10, 64)
+ pageSize, err = strconv.ParseInt(pageSizeParam, 10, 64)

This alteration will ensure that the page and pageSize variables are safely handled as 64-bit integers, thus preventing any potential data truncation or loss.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02bc58e and be40f44.

Files selected for processing (1)

• backend/app/api/handlers/v1/v1_ctrl_assets.go (1 hunks)

Additional context used

GitHub Check: CodeQL

backend/app/api/handlers/v1/v1_ctrl_assets.go

[failure] 55-55: Incorrect conversion between integer types
Incorrect conversion of a signed 64-bit integer from strconv.ParseInt to a lower bit size type int without an upper bound check.

Additional comments not posted (1)

backend/app/api/handlers/v1/v1_ctrl_assets.go (1)

33-33: Ensure correct handling of 64-bit integers in asset ID parsing.

I see you have adjusted the strconv.ParseInt function to correctly parse asset IDs as 64-bit integers. This is a crucial fix and aligns perfectly with the objective of the PR to handle larger integer values, thus preventing the previous errors when dealing with large asset IDs.