-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 672
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(css): Prevent transforming @page properties like size #2341
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit e358912:
|
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ export const css = | |||
const x = styles[key as keyof typeof styles] | |||
const val = typeof x === 'function' ? x(theme) : x | |||
|
|||
if (val && typeof val === 'object') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that this is the implementation for the solution, but I'm very conflicted about having a special case for @page
.
It feels bad, doesn't it? Could we maybe... choose a different solution?
There's no perfect solution here, but I suppose I'd rather resign from the size
shorthand and add w
and h
shorthands in its place.
An alternative we could consider — could we just not implement anything?
There's an escape hatch with css
prop, Safari doesn't support @page
. Seems less correct than dropping the size
alias, and we'd probably need an error thrown only in development, but it's something 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
w/h shorthands will require changes by a significant percentage of Theme UI users & seems like a price they shouldn’t have to pay to me. The number of people using @page
is likely tiny, & it’s very easy to update what code in the extremely rare case this change breaks it (imagine usages of that selector to find & replace vs “size” in a codebase). This isn’t very correct but it just doesn’t seem like a common issue to be sad about not getting your (screen-optimized) theme as automatically accessible in printing page setup for some browsers.
Closes #2166. This may not be ideal because it prevents transforms of all properties inside
@page
, but the way our transform function is setup, it doesn't seem easy to fix otherwise. This means use of margin properties inside@page
will no longer be transformed; in my experience you're only using those properties so you can define physical units likein
&cm
instead of pixels, so doesn't seem like a big deal to me.