Fix running inference on Bottom-up models with CUDA

[gitttt-1234]

This PR fixes a bug that occurs while running inference on bottom-up models with CUDA. The error was associated with using legacy tensor constructor (torch.Tensor), which doesn't support assigning device on construction.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Updated tensor initialization method for improved consistency with recommended practices.
  • Adjusted the function signature of compute_dists to enhance code clarity without impacting functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The diff updates tensor initialization in sleap_nn/inference/paf_grouping.py by replacing torch.Tensor with torch.tensor for creating a tensor. Additionally, the function signature of compute_dists in sleap_nn/evaluation.py has been modified by adding a comma at the end of the positive_pairs parameter. These changes maintain existing functionality while aligning with preferred practices. No modifications were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

File	Change Summary
sleap_nn/.../paf_grouping.py	Replaced tensor creation from torch.Tensor([...], device=X.device) to torch.tensor([...], device=X.device).
sleap_nn/.../evaluation.py	Updated function signature of compute_dists by adding a comma after positive_pairs.

Poem

Hopping through code on a bright, cheery day,
I tweaked a small tensor in my own rabbit way.
With a skip and a jump, the code now runs light,
A tiny improvement that feels just right.
Here’s to smooth progress under the moon’s soft ray!

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat

• We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
• You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
• Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f36b6d6 and c36cb06.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• sleap_nn/evaluation.py (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• sleap_nn/evaluation.py

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)

• GitHub Check: Tests (macos-14, Python 3.9)
• GitHub Check: Tests (windows-latest, Python 3.9)
• GitHub Check: Tests (ubuntu-latest, Python 3.9)
• GitHub Check: Lint

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.21%. Comparing base (f093ce2) to head (c36cb06).
Report is 38 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #133      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.64%   97.21%   +0.56%     
==========================================
  Files          23       40      +17     
  Lines        1818     4128    +2310     
==========================================
+ Hits         1757     4013    +2256     
- Misses         61      115      +54     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.