Skip to content

Editorial: Fix type mismatch for class without constructor #3664

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2025
Merged

Editorial: Fix type mismatch for class without constructor #3664

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions spec.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6812,7 +6812,7 @@ <h1>
<h1>
InitializeInstanceElements (
_O_: an Object,
_constructor_: an ECMAScript function object,
_constructor_: an ECMAScript function object or a built-in function object,
): either a normal completion containing ~unused~ or a throw completion
</h1>
<dl class="header">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -25097,7 +25097,7 @@ <h1>
1. Let _result_ be ? OrdinaryCreateFromConstructor(NewTarget, *"%Object.prototype%"*).
1. Perform ? InitializeInstanceElements(_result_, _F_).
1. Return NormalCompletion(_result_).
1. Let _F_ be CreateBuiltinFunction(_defaultConstructor_, 0, _className_, « [[ConstructorKind]], [[SourceText]] », the current Realm Record, _constructorParent_).
1. Let _F_ be CreateBuiltinFunction(_defaultConstructor_, 0, _className_, « [[ConstructorKind]], [[SourceText]], [[PrivateMethods]], [[Fields]] », the current Realm Record, _constructorParent_).
1. Else,
1. Let _constructorInfo_ be ! DefineMethod of _constructor_ with arguments _proto_ and _constructorParent_.
1. Let _F_ be _constructorInfo_.[[Closure]].
Expand Down