Skip to content

Conversation

@gesa
Copy link
Member

@gesa gesa commented Oct 8, 2025

I will forever continue to chip away at this until we can publish a standard without someone giving me a full page of formatting problems that need fixing.

Re the draft copyright: this is not an Ecma copyright. The only copyrights that shall appear on Ecma standards are found on the Ecma website, and they are the default copyright and the alternative copyright statement.

I will forever continue to chip away at this until we can publish a standard without someone giving me a page of bullet points that need fixing
@bakkot
Copy link
Member

bakkot commented Oct 13, 2025

Wish I knew where that draft copyright came from, but this seems fine.

width: 500px;
}

.adoption-info { display: none; }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Who is using this and what's it for? I don't see it in ECMA-262.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's the paragraph that says "This Ecma Standard was developed by Technical Committee NN and was adopted by the General Assembly of Month Year."

title.innerHTML = restoreSuperScripts(title.innerHTML);

rearrangeTables();
formatCaptions();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why change the captions only for print? If Ecma guidelines have us using - instead of :, shouldn't that also apply to the web version?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Glad you brought it up 😁 I actually have a change in the actual figures in a follow-up PR. wanted this merged before I opened it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants