Micro-generator framework that makes it easy for an entire team to create files with a level of uniformity.
Plop is essentially glue code between inquirer prompts and handlebar templates. You can also add your own handlebar helper methods and use them in your templates.
$ npm install -g plop
$ npm install --save-dev plop
module.exports = function (plop) {
// create your generators here
plop.setGenerator('basics', {
description: 'this is a skeleton plopfile',
prompts: [],
actions: []
});
};
The main parts of a plop generator are the plop file (plopfile.js
) and the templates. Templates can either be inline, or in separate files.
A basic plop file starts its life as a lowly node module that exports a function that accepts the plop
object.
module.exports = function (plop) {};
The plop
object offers four main functions (addHelper
, addPartial
, addPrompt
, setGenerator
).
- name {String}
- helper {Function}
addHelper
directly corresponds to the handlebars method registerHelper
. So if you are familiar with handlebars helpers, then you already know how this works.
module.exports = function (plop) {
plop.addHelper('upperCase', function (text) {
return text.toUpperCase();
});
// or in es6/es2015
plop.addHelper('upperCase', (txt) => txt.toUpperCase());
};
- name {String}
- template {String}
addPartial
directly corresponds to the handlebars method registerPartial
. So if you are familiar with handlebars partials, then you should be good to go here as well.
module.exports = function (plop) {
plop.addPartial('fullName', '{{ firstName }} {{ lastName }}');
};
- name {String}
- inquirerPlugin {Constructor}
addPrompt
is a shortcut method to inquirer's prompt.registerPrompt
function. If inquirer's built in prompt types don't quite cut the mustard for you, you can write your own or look at this list of custom prompts that other plop users have found useful.
module.exports = function (plop) {
plop.addPrompt('directory', require('inquirer-directory'));
};
Next we need to setup a generator using plop.setGenerator
- name {String}
- config {Object}
The config object needs to include prompts
and actions
(description
is optional). The prompts array is passed to inquirer. The actions
array is a list of actions to take (described in greater detail below)
module.exports = function (plop) {
plop.setGenerator('test', {
description: 'this is a test',
prompts: [{
type: 'input',
name: 'name',
message: 'What is your name?',
validate: function (value) {
if ((/.+/).test(value)) { return true; }
return 'name is required';
}
}],
actions: [{
type: 'add',
path: 'folder/{{dashCase name}}.txt',
templateFile: 'templates/temp.txt'
}]
});
};
The plop.setGenerator
config object includes an array of actions to take. There are two types of actions you can include (add and modify). Both types of actions require a path to take action on (all paths are based on the location of the plopfile), and a template to use.
Let's start with the simpler of the 2 actions, add
.
The add
action is used to (you guessed it) add files to your project. The path property is a handlebars template that will be used to create the file by name. The file contents will be determined by the template
or templateFile
property. As you've probably guessed, the template
property is used for an inline template while the templateFile
is a path to the template stored in a file somewhere else in the project. I suggest keeping your template files in a plop-templates
folder at the root of the project.
The modify
action is similar to add
, but the main difference is that it will use a pattern
property to find/replace text in the file specified by the path
property. The pattern
property should be a RegExp and capture groups can be used in the replacement template using $1, $2, etc. More details on modify can be found in the example folder.
The Add
and Modify
actions will take care of almost every case that plop is designed to handle. However, plop does offer custom actions for the node/js guru. A custom action is a function that is provided in the actions array.
- The custom action will be executed with the question responses as its only parameter.
- Plop will wait for the custom action to complete before executing the next action.
- The function must let plop known what’s happening through the return value. If you return a
Promise
, we won’t start other actions until the promise resolves. If you return a message (anything else exceptundefined
), we know that the action is done. We’ll report the message in the status of the action. - A custom action fails if the promise is rejected, or the function throws an Exception
See the example plopfile for a sample synchronous custom action.
Alternatively, actions
can itself be a function that takes responses data
as a parameter and should return the actions array.
This allows you to adapt actions to provided answers:
module.exports = function (plop) {
plop.setGenerator('test', {
description: 'this is a test',
prompts: [{
type: 'input',
name: 'name',
message: 'What is your name?',
validate: function (value) {
if ((/.+/).test(value)) { return true; }
return 'name is required';
}
},{
type: 'confirm',
name: 'wantTacos',
message: 'Do you want tacos?'
}],
actions: function(data) {
var actions = [];
if(data.wantTacos) {
actions.push({
type: 'add',
path: 'folder/{{dashCase name}}.txt',
templateFile: 'templates/tacos.txt'
});
} else {
actions.push({
type: 'add',
path: 'folder/{{dashCase name}}.txt',
templateFile: 'templates/burritos.txt'
});
}
return actions;
}
});
};
These methods and attributes are available off the plop
object. They are mostly used by plop internally, but some can come in handy when you're doing something a little more custom.
plop.load(targets, [config], [include]) - see details
- targets {String | Array}
- config {Object}
- include {Object}
loads generators, helpers and/or partials from another plopfile or npm module
- template {String}
- data {Object}
Renders the handlebars template
using the data
passed in. Returns the rendered template.
- name {String}
Gets a generator config object by name.
Gets an array of generator names and descriptions.
Returns the absolute path to the plopfile in use.
The instance of inquirer that plop is using internally.
The instance of handlebars that plop is using internally.
There are a few helpers that I have found useful enough to include with plop. They are mostly case modifiers, but here is the complete list.
- camelCase: changeFormatToThis
- snakeCase: change_format_to_this
- dashCase/kebabCase: change-format-to-this
- dotCase: change.format.to.this
- pathCase: change/format/to/this
- properCase/pascalCase: ChangeFormatToThis
- lowerCase: change format to this
- sentenceCase: Change format to this,
- constantCase: CHANGE_FORMAT_TO_THIS
- titleCase: Change Format To This
- pkg: look up a property from a package.json file in the same folder as the plopfile.
Once plop is installed, and you have created a generator, you are ready to run plop from the terminal. Running plop
with no parameters will present you with a list of generators to pick from. You can also run plop [generatorName]
to trigger a generator directly.
Run plop --help
to display the manual of different options you can pass to plop, e.g., specify a custom path to the plopfile.
You can also run the Plop generator completely standalone as follows. See docker-gen for an example.
It can even be optimized to the following:
const plop = require('plop')
plop.runGenerator({
name: name,
basePath: plopfilePath
// ...
inputs: (config) => {
data = Object.assign(data, {
root: 'app'
})
// console.log('data', data)
return data
},
// List of actions to take.
// Here we "add" new files from our templates.
actions: {
list: [{
}, {
}],
item: [{}, {}]
}
}, xtraOpts)
Because when you create your boilerplate separate from your code, you naturally put more time and thought into it.
Because saving your team (or yourself) 5-15 minutes when creating every route, component, controller, helper, test, view, etc... really adds up.
Because context switching is expensive and saving time is not the only benefit to automating workflows
Yeoman is great and it does a fantastic job of scaffolding out an initial codebase for you. However, the initial codebase is just the beginning. I believe the true benefit to generators is not realized by saving a developer 40 hours in the beginning, but by saving a team days of work over the life of the project. Yes, yeoman has sub generators that do a similar job. However, if you're like me, you will continually tweak structure and code throughout the project till the sub generators that came built into your yeoman seed are no longer valid. These structures change as requirements change and code is refactored. Plop allows your generator code to live INSIDE your project and be versioned right along with the code it generates.
If you already have another generator that your organization uses and loves, use it :-). If you don't, try plop. It will make your code more consistent, save you lots of time, and (if you've read this far) you already know how to use it.