-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
restore community tasks as openshift addons #2427
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
538fe90
to
bbca872
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/test pull-tekton-operator-integration-tests |
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ spec: | |||
value: "true" | |||
- name: resolverStepActions | |||
value: "true" | |||
- name: communityClusterTasks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think name should be communityTasks
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ | |||
/* | |||
Copyright 2022 The Tekton Authors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copyright 2022 The Tekton Authors | |
Copyright 2024 The Tekton Authors |
dc9939d
to
88ef347
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
LGTM |
@savitaashture ptal |
Thank you @jkhelil PR looks good to me |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@savitaashture I have checked the upgrade scenario and seems working well, no issues. |
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ spec: | |||
value: "true" | |||
- name: resolverStepActions | |||
value: "true" | |||
- name: communityTasks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Originally we called it communityClusterTasks
, shouldn't it be communityResolverTasks
so that we follow established naming conventions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, make sense as we have resolverTasks resolverStepcActions etc
88ef347
to
c6b3852
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
We should consider #2439 to fix the upgrade issue |
c6b3852
to
78fd151
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
78fd151
to
7287d12
Compare
fixed now, Upgrade test working well |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
7287d12
to
4d231f8
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
Changes
In 1.17 after removing clusterTasks all the community clusterTasks also removed
here we put back community tasks as tasks under openshift-pipelines namespace
Submitter Checklist
These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:
make test lint
before submitting a PRSee the contribution guide for more details.
Release Notes