Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update terraform-module #353

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2024

Conversation

terraform-ibm-modules-ops
Copy link
Contributor

@terraform-ibm-modules-ops terraform-ibm-modules-ops commented Dec 14, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
terraform-ibm-modules/cos/ibm (source) module patch 8.15.10 -> 8.15.15
terraform-ibm-modules/kms-all-inclusive/ibm (source) module minor 4.18.1 -> 4.19.1
terraform-ibm-modules/secrets-manager/ibm (source) module patch 1.19.4 -> 1.19.7

Release Notes

terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-cos (terraform-ibm-modules/cos/ibm)

v8.15.15

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update terraform terraform-ibm-modules/kms-all-inclusive/ibm to v4.19.1 (#​802) (983f847)

v8.15.14

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update terraform terraform-ibm-modules/kms-all-inclusive/ibm to v4.19.0 (#​800) (de923bd)

v8.15.13

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update terraform terraform-ibm-modules/secrets-manager/ibm to v1.19.6 (#​798) (d0d01c1)

v8.15.12

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Fixed bug in fscloud submodule where object locking related config was being ignored (#​796) (dcbbd33)

v8.15.11

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-kms-all-inclusive (terraform-ibm-modules/kms-all-inclusive/ibm)

v4.19.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update terraform ibm to latest for the deployable architecture solution (#​602) (cd64ef9)

v4.19.0

Compare Source

Features
  • adds the ability to use CBR rules in DA. It adds a new variable cbr_rules in DA variables. (#​594) (c28a3ff)

v4.18.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update terraform terraform-ibm-modules/kms-key/ibm to v1.3.0 (#​603) (230be46)

v4.18.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • removed creation of CBR rule in this module because it is created already in root module(terraform-ibm-modules/key-protect/ibm) (#​601) (9037f4c)
terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-secrets-manager (terraform-ibm-modules/secrets-manager/ibm)

v1.19.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v1.19.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: DA updates:
    - locked ibm provider version to 1.73.0
    8 updated KMS module version to 4.18.1 (#​257) (51b861f)

v1.19.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • updated the region selector in the DA to only show Secrets Manager supported regions (#​251) (b43e33b)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-ops terraform-ibm-modules-ops changed the title fix(deps): update terraform terraform-ibm-modules/cos/ibm to v8.15.11 fix(deps): update terraform-module Dec 17, 2024
@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev terraform-ibm-modules-dev merged commit 75cb73c into main Dec 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@terraform-ibm-modules-dev terraform-ibm-modules-dev deleted the renovate/terraform-module branch December 22, 2024 16:12
@terraform-ibm-modules-ops
Copy link
Contributor Author

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.15.7 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants