Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for jerk limits #1001

Conversation

Levi-Armstrong
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong force-pushed the feature/add-jerk-limits branch 2 times, most recently from 490f33f to 1835c3b Compare May 28, 2024 16:50
@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong force-pushed the feature/add-jerk-limits branch from 1835c3b to 1474132 Compare May 28, 2024 18:34
@Levi-Armstrong
Copy link
Contributor Author

@johnwason Do you know what the issue is with the conda builds?

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.17%. Comparing base (a6bfa92) to head (1474132).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1001      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.18%   90.17%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         280      280              
  Lines       15701    15753      +52     
==========================================
+ Hits        14160    14205      +45     
- Misses       1541     1548       +7     

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong merged commit 660d42d into tesseract-robotics:master May 28, 2024
10 of 13 checks passed
@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong deleted the feature/add-jerk-limits branch May 28, 2024 19:41
@johnwason
Copy link
Contributor

I don't see the obvious reason for the failure. I will have to look into this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants