Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add issuer_type=network #867

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

isaacvetter
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@jmandel jmandel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. I think this should work well. A few suggestions:

  • Document explicitly that the elements of the network_participants need to have have a label, locations, and issuer_type (with the same meaning that these properties have on top-level entries)
  • Roll up the locations from the network_participants into a locations on the top-level network, so existing "search by state" lookups will find networks (but keep them on the locations too, so future tools can tell which participants operate in which locations)
  • Revert JSON examples in both files to use spaces, not tabs.

@jpp9
Copy link
Contributor

jpp9 commented Oct 7, 2022

i like this, thanks Isaac.

i would suggest we add subtypes to the network issuer type so that verifiers and others can distinguish between networks of health systems, networks of labs, or public health networks, for example. we could begin with just network.health_system for now?

> Document explicitly that the elements of the network_participants need to have have a label, locations, and issuer_type (with the same meaning that these properties have on top-level entries)
> Roll up the locations from the network_participants into a locations on the top-level network, so existing "search by state" lookups will find networks (but keep them on the locations too, so future tools can tell which participants operate in which locations)

Note that I'm leaving location as optional for the network participant, just as it is on the issuer.
sw industry: discuss. (vim had it right)
also json no longer validates
@isaacvetter
Copy link
Contributor Author

thank you, @jpp9 , @jmandel !

I think I've incorporated your feedback. Mind re-reviewing?

Copy link
Contributor

@jmandel jmandel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One line-edit to add a missing JSON ], otherwise looks good to me -- more than sufficient to drive a decision in VCI. Thanks!

METADATA.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Josh Mandel <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants