Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closes #1653 Allow specifying the organization in content roles #1654

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

smeeus
Copy link
Contributor

@smeeus smeeus commented Jul 30, 2023

Organization can be specified for items in content variable arrays. The variable foreman_organization is the default value for backward compatibility.

@smeeus smeeus changed the title Closes #1653 Allow specifying the organization in content roles [WIP] Closes #1653 Allow specifying the organization in content roles Jul 30, 2023
@JaketheZ
Copy link

Closes #1653

@smeeus smeeus force-pushed the content_roles_organization branch 2 times, most recently from e6902d8 to 453c1cb Compare February 22, 2025 16:37
@smeeus smeeus changed the title [WIP] Closes #1653 Allow specifying the organization in content roles Closes #1653 Allow specifying the organization in content roles Feb 22, 2025
@smeeus smeeus force-pushed the content_roles_organization branch from ee4e66c to bf0973b Compare March 1, 2025 13:09
@smeeus
Copy link
Contributor Author

smeeus commented Mar 1, 2025

I've pulled in some of @JaketheZ 's commits from #1815 .
I have not included the manifest related changes for a couple of reasons; the biggest reason being that changing the way the foreman_manifest variable works, changing it from a plain dict to an array of dicts will most likely cause backward compatibility issues at some point.

@smeeus
Copy link
Contributor Author

smeeus commented Mar 1, 2025

@evgeni Any additional thoughts and comments on the changes proposed in this PR?

PS: This is the PR mentioned at CfgMgmt Camp 2025 regarding multiple organizations for content roles.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants