Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change command for Lifecycle and Environment Path #3533

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bangelic
Copy link
Contributor

What changes are you introducing?

Updating command language.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

The language in two different commands appears redundant.

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.7.

@bangelic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sjha4 Can you take a look at the changes I made here and let me know if this is accurate to what was discussed with Jeremy? Thanks!

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bangelic bangelic force-pushed the bangelic-SAT-24004-Update-Lifecycle-Environment-documentation-for-creating-Lifecycle-Environment-path-using-CLI-procedure branch from 963a27a to cea9cc2 Compare December 19, 2024 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants