-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 753
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support setting refreshToken #994
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #994 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
- Complexity 190 191 +1
===========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 514 516 +2
===========================================
+ Hits 514 516 +2
|
Heya @ramsey @shadowhand could I bother you for a release with this PR? A few commits are missing from 2.7.0 2.7.0...master - thanks 🙏🏻 |
@ramsey @shadowhand sorry to nag again but it's been a year and still no release :) |
And if someone does a release please merge #1039 first so we get PHP 8.4 compatibility sorted as well :) |
In the cases where the refresh token isn't included in the response when using it to refresh an access token, it's often necessary to persist the original refresh token for later use. When this happens it's convenient to store the refresh token in the
AccessToken
object as it was originally.However, because
AccessToken::$refreshToken
is a protected property it's not possible to assign this value directly. ImplementingAccessToken::setRefreshToken()
allows the refresh token to be set and stored along with theAccessToken
object.The workaround I've found is to serialize the
AccessToken
object to JSON, add the refresh token, then reinstantiate a newAccessToken
object. It would be great if this wasn't necessary.Building the functionality directly into the library to automatically carry over the refresh token would be great (as suggested in #658), but I'm not sure if that behavior would apply to all cases. It might cause confusion if it was intentionally omitted from the response because it's no longer valid.
Related to #658