Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Script updating archive at 2024-10-01T01:04:33Z. [ci skip]
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
ID Bot committed Oct 1, 2024
1 parent bbfb48d commit 2d0dffb
Showing 1 changed file with 14 additions and 12 deletions.
26 changes: 14 additions & 12 deletions archive.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"magic": "E!vIA5L86J2I",
"timestamp": "2024-09-29T01:03:29.198948+00:00",
"timestamp": "2024-10-01T01:04:29.106999+00:00",
"repo": "thomas-fossati/draft-tls13-iot",
"labels": [
{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@
"id": "I_kwDOEBGZx850lTa_",
"title": "Maximum validity period",
"url": "https://github.com/thomas-fossati/draft-tls13-iot/issues/34",
"state": "OPEN",
"state": "CLOSED",
"author": "hannestschofenig",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"assignees": [
Expand All @@ -674,8 +674,8 @@
],
"body": "> In IoT deployment scenarios it is often expected that the IDevIDs have no maximum validity period. For this purpose the use of a special value for the notAfter date field, the GeneralizedTime value of 99991231235959Z, is utilized. If this is done, then CA certificates and certificates of subordinate CAs cannot have a maximum validity period either. Hence, it requires careful consideration whether it is appropriate to issue IDevID certificates with no maximum validity period.\r\n\r\n\r\nMichael: One answer is that the RootCA->subordinateCA signatures might be limited, but resigned regularly, assuming that the new signature/certificate can somehow be retrieved by infrastructure that needs to verify it. It's not crazy that industrial IoT operators would receive regular updates. The subordinateCA->IDevID signature can not be replaced in the device, but it could be augumented in some way over time.\r\n\r\n",
"createdAt": "2023-10-22T15:04:29Z",
"updatedAt": "2024-02-09T15:45:11Z",
"closedAt": null,
"updatedAt": "2024-09-30T14:12:03Z",
"closedAt": "2024-09-30T14:12:03Z",
"comments": [
{
"author": "hannestschofenig",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3471,24 +3471,26 @@
"id": "PR_kwDOEBGZx857onZ6",
"title": "proposed text to deal with subordinate CA validity",
"url": "https://github.com/thomas-fossati/draft-tls13-iot/pull/57",
"state": "OPEN",
"state": "MERGED",
"author": "mcr",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"assignees": [],
"labels": [],
"body": "close #34 ",
"createdAt": "2024-09-16T14:58:17Z",
"updatedAt": "2024-09-23T15:37:35Z",
"updatedAt": "2024-09-30T14:12:06Z",
"baseRepository": "thomas-fossati/draft-tls13-iot",
"baseRefName": "master",
"baseRefOid": "d7e5ab7d113b30243c66d9f3e5b88fe6954d6e34",
"baseRefOid": "3bd8e9855ccff5de192fa89ae0246ad8ee635a1d",
"headRepository": "thomas-fossati/draft-tls13-iot",
"headRefName": "lifetime-of-certification-authorities",
"headRefOid": "4cb2b65b193b12432afdb7b55955bf4b85516af0",
"closedAt": null,
"mergedAt": null,
"mergedBy": null,
"mergeCommit": null,
"headRefOid": "a115e67c68746ae3f025a1cfedf286e6b1a3cb12",
"closedAt": "2024-09-30T14:12:02Z",
"mergedAt": "2024-09-30T14:12:02Z",
"mergedBy": "hannestschofenig",
"mergeCommit": {
"oid": "d387c9c195d090dcdf1ebd11071e80e322235a3b"
},
"comments": [],
"reviews": [
{
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 2d0dffb

Please sign in to comment.