Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mcs: forward current http request to mcs #7078
mcs: forward current http request to mcs #7078
Changes from 1 commit
4e6f3b3
780736b
4012981
e8a88b9
0f733dc
32a81e3
7eafe59
40f129f
98a573b
590d971
2193aff
f070884
338058d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check warning on line 118 in pkg/utils/apiutil/serverapi/middleware.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pkg/utils/apiutil/serverapi/middleware.go#L118
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it only used for testing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it is now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then, I think we shouldn't add it in the header, the testing code should not affect the normal situation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it is not added to resp, is there any other way to tell whether it is processed by the PD server or the scheduling server?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When debugging on a real cluster, it may also be useful to identify the origin of the server handling the request.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we keep this header filed, what about setting its value to the microservice name rather than a
true
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
e.g scheduling?tso?Is it necessary?