-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
*: decouple operator handler and server #7089
Conversation
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7089 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 74.33% 74.37% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 437 439 +2
Lines 46855 46938 +83
==========================================
+ Hits 34831 34912 +81
- Misses 8947 8952 +5
+ Partials 3077 3074 -3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
type server struct { | ||
*Server | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (s *server) GetCoordinator() *schedule.Coordinator { | ||
return s.GetRaftCluster().GetCoordinator() | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (s *server) GetCluster() sche.SharedCluster { | ||
return s.GetRaftCluster() | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can put common code in server/handler.go, which avoid redundant code in scheduling server and pd server
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
/merge |
@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 70d71c6
|
@lhy1024: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
ref tikv#5839 Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Ref #5839
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note