scripts: fix client and tools cover profile

[HuSharp]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Ref #4399

What is changed and how does it work?

• add client cover profile
• make client test with failpoint

Check List

Tests

• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

Release note

None.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• nolouch
• rleungx

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[ti-chi-bot]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #8020 (550c952) into master (80a2fd9) will increase coverage by 1.33%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 550c952 differs from pull request most recent head 3b242a4. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3b242a4 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8020      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.58%   74.92%   +1.33%     
==========================================
  Files         436      467      +31     
  Lines       48568    52406    +3838     
==========================================
+ Hits        35737    39263    +3526     
+ Misses       9764     9696      -68     
- Partials     3067     3447     +380     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	74.92% <ø> (+1.33%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[HuSharp]

There is no need to enable failpoint in this command, ci-test-job will turn on failpoint at the beginning.

pd/Makefile

Lines 248 to 251 in 6822137

	ci-test-job: install-tools dashboard-ui
	@$(FAILPOINT_ENABLE)
	./scripts/ci-subtask.sh $(JOB_COUNT) $(JOB_INDEX) || { $(FAILPOINT_DISABLE); exit 1; }
	@$(FAILPOINT_DISABLE)

Disabling useless commands here will reduce some of ci time

[rleungx]

Before we can run make ci-test-job in client package independently.

[HuSharp]

Maybe make test is better suited for local testing 🤔(although the tools package does not have make test now, other Makefiles all have make test)
Or do you think make test needs to be merged with make ci-test-job as the same command?

[HuSharp]

support make test and make ci-test-job currently

[HuSharp]

can increase 1.23%

[nolouch]

rest lgtm

[HuSharp]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@HuSharp: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 3b242a4