-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sync: improve the docs for recv_many
#7201
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
sync: improve the docs for recv_many
#7201
Conversation
/// * Return when the number of received messages reaches `limit`. | ||
/// * Return earlier when the channel is closed or no further messages area | ||
/// available in the channel at the time. In these cases, | ||
/// the number of received messages can be lower than `limit`. | ||
/// |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I'm skimming this, I'm going to see "return when the number of received messages reaches limit
" and I will get the wrong impression. I agree the current docs are bad, but I don't think this wording is good either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please give me a hint in which way the current wording isn't up to par? Otherwise I'm not sure in which direction to go with this. 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about something like this?
Receives between 1 and `limit` messages into `buffer`.
This method is intended as a performance optimization for cases where
you wish to process messages in batches. The method may return less than
`limit` messages, so `recv_many` can *not* be used to receive a fixed
number of messages in one call.
This method waits until at least one message is available, and then
receives as many messages as it can into `buffer` efficiently. The
number of messages added to `buffer` is returned, and this number will
often be less than `limit` even if the channel is still open.
For non-zero values of `limit`, this method will never return `0` unless
the channel has been closed and there are no remaining messages in the
channel's queue. This indicates that no further values can ever be
received from this `Receiver`. The channel is closed when all senders
have been dropped, or when [`close`] is called.
Note that if [`close`] is called, but there are still outstanding
[`Permits`] from before it was closed, the channel is not considered
closed by `recv_many` until the permits are used or dropped.
The capacity of `buffer` is increased as needed.
Trying to explain a bit better when `recv_many` will return and why in some cases the returned number of received messages is below the input parameter `limit`. Additionally the docs for the bounded and unbounded `recv_many` are adjusted to match.
5674da6
to
4d665e6
Compare
Little bump here. Anything I can do to improve the state of this PR? :) |
Trying to explain a bit better when
recv_many
will return and why in some cases the returned number of received messages is below the input parameterlimit
.Motivation
I stumbled upon
recv_many
for the first time ever in a bit of code while reviewing a PR. I took some issue with how the function was called (inside awhile
loop) and had a look at the docs to understand why that would be necessary. When reading through the docs it seemed to me as if there was seemingly no need for a loop becauserecv_many
would apparently wait for new messages if none were available, only returning when thelimit
would be reached or the channel would be closed. I gave this a try in a smaller code example and had to realize that this was not the case. Looking at the source I found thatrecv_many
would only wait for the first message, but would return early if the channel queue had no messages available after that, even when not being closed. At this point I felt that the docs were a bit unclear in that regard.Solution
By describing the behavior a bit more explicitly I am hoping to improve the docs and avoid misunderstandings like mine in the future.