Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add workflow for topos integration tests #26

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 14, 2023
Merged

Conversation

atanmarko
Copy link
Member

Description

Add workflow that would run topos integration tests without frontend.

Fixes TP-811

Additions and Changes

Topos integration and regression tests (like checks if certificate are produced, broadcasted and delivered, and if certificates are pushed to the smart contracts) will be executed without frontend tests for the purpose of checking and debugging changes on the topos repository.

PR Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added or updated tests that comprehensively prove my change is effective or that my feature works

@atanmarko atanmarko changed the title feat: add forkflow for topos integration tests feat: add workflow for topos integration tests Dec 12, 2023
Copy link

@foo0x29a foo0x29a left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good to me. Maybe the @topos-protocol/protocol has inputs?

@atanmarko
Copy link
Member Author

Btw. the issue why currently Topos Integration Tests / e2e fail is because sequencer didn't catch up with syncing, so some fix delay on local infra is necessary.

@atanmarko atanmarko merged commit 37b6fe5 into main Dec 14, 2023
7 of 8 checks passed
@atanmarko atanmarko deleted the feat/TP-811 branch December 14, 2023 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants