Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comment out the postgres configuration from docker-compose.yml #504

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

soekja
Copy link
Contributor

@soekja soekja commented Feb 6, 2025

Description

Comment out the postgres configuration from docker-compose.yml. I think leaving postgres details commented is better than removing them entirely. This keeps simple optionality visible for newcomers.

DCO Affirmation

I affirm that all code in every commit of this pull request conforms to the terms of the Topoteretes Developer Certificate of Origin

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved service configuration by standardizing resource allocation settings.
    • Temporarily deactivated a non-essential database service along with its related storage setup, while keeping reactivation instructions for future needs.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the docker-compose configuration by changing the CPU limit value for the cognee service from single to double quotes in the docker-compose.yml file. It also disables the postgres service and its associated volume (postgres_data) by commenting out their entire configurations. The overall file structure remains intact with only these selective modifications.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docker-compose.yml Updated CPU limit value for cognee service (changed quotes from single to double); commented out the entire postgres service and its associated postgres_data volume.

Sequence Diagram(s):

Possibly related PRs

Poem

I'm a rabbit hopping in config delight,
Tweaking quotes by day and into the night.
CPU limits now gleam with double shine,
And Postgres rests till it's time to realign.
With a hop and a skip, my code's looking fine!

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Feb 6, 2025

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

Since your pull request originates from a forked repository, GitGuardian is not able to associate the secrets uncovered with secret incidents on your GitGuardian dashboard.
Skipping this check run and merging your pull request will create secret incidents on your GitGuardian dashboard.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
9573981 Triggered Generic Password 1ce9e16 .env.template View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docker-compose.yml (2)

63-77: Commented Out PostgreSQL Service Block
The entire PostgreSQL service configuration has been successfully commented out to maintain visibility without activating it. This approach is thoughtful for newcomers who might need a reference configuration later.
• Note: There is a minor typo in the comment on line 77 ("VOLUES" should be "volumes").


82-85: Cleaning Up Trailing Spaces in Comments
Lines 82–85 have trailing spaces (as flagged by YAMLlint). Although they are in comments, removing the extra whitespace will improve file cleanliness and prevent potential linter warnings. Consider applying a cleanup as shown below.

Proposed diff:

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 82-82: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 83-83: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c42c10 and 22581bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docker-compose.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
docker-compose.yml

[error] 82-82: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 83-83: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: docker-compose-test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docker-compose.yml (1)

22-23: Updated CPU Limit Formatting
The change to use double quotes for the CPU limit value (cpus: "2.0") improves consistency in YAML formatting. Ensure that this change is aligned with your deployment expectations.

@dexters1
Copy link
Collaborator

dexters1 commented Feb 7, 2025

I wouldn't comment out postgres from docker compose since we use it all the time, you can run docker compose with specifying only the containers you need if you don't need postgres.

@soekja
Copy link
Contributor Author

soekja commented Feb 7, 2025

I understand you guys are using postgres, but I was approaching this from the perspective of the experience of new community members who may not have docker experience or technical background. In that frame of mind, default should enable smoothest onboarding in the SQLite-NetworkX-LanceDB scenario, hence leaving *postgress details visible but commented.

@Vasilije1990 Vasilije1990 merged commit 55a5015 into topoteretes:dev Feb 10, 2025
8 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants