-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 524
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Native TOML config #3309
[WIP] Native TOML config #3309
Conversation
src/tox/config/source/toml.py
Outdated
return f"{type(self).__name__}(path={self.path})" | ||
|
||
def transform_section(self, section: Section) -> Section: # noqa: PLR6301 | ||
return IniSection(section.prefix, section.name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should not use the ini system at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I duplicated IniSection
to TomlSection
for the time being. I plan to do more clean up later on.
src/tox/config/source/toml.py
Outdated
if in_section.prefix is not None: # no prefix specified, so this could imply our own prefix | ||
yield IniSection(in_section.prefix, a_base) | ||
|
||
def sections(self) -> Iterator[IniSection]: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It makes no sense why have anything to do with the ini system here.
This is experimental API! Expect things to be broken. | ||
""" | ||
|
||
CORE_SECTION = CORE |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see why we should reuse the ini systems prefixes for both the core and testing environment.
tests/config/source/test_discover.py
Outdated
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ | |||
|
|||
def out_no_src(path: Path) -> str: | |||
return ( | |||
f"ROOT: No tox.ini or setup.cfg or pyproject.toml found, assuming empty tox.ini at {path}\n" | |||
f"ROOT: No tox.ini or tox.toml or setup.cfg or pyproject.toml found, assuming empty tox.ini at {path}\n" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I agree with the need for a dedicated TOML file. I am currently -1 on adding that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am in favour of defaulting to pyproject.toml
but still allowing user to define an alternative config file to load. Some might find a need for it (like CI/CD, or custom user modified one when they cannot merge their changes in the default one).
I would say that even with alternative filename, I would still expect it to follow the same sections as the pyproject.toml
, just to keep code simple.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went through the docs for several non-build tools I know (excluded those which do not support pyproject.toml
at all) to see if the support custom TOML file. Here are results:
Tool | Custom TOML file | Custom TOML root |
---|---|---|
mypy | none | |
ruff | ruff.toml |
none |
bump-my-version | .bumpversion.toml |
tool.bumpversion or bumpversion |
isort | none | |
black | none | |
codespell | none | |
coverage | none | |
towncrier | towncrier.toml |
tool.towncrier |
I'd say custom TOML file is not that rare. Custom root in TOML file seems to vary.
) | ||
assert custom_section["a"] == "b" | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not a fan of this long comments.
I've ditched |
|
||
|
||
class TomlSource(Source): | ||
"""Configuration sourced from a toml file (such as tox.toml). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not want a dedicated toml, but should be inside pyproject.toml.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I keep that in mind, I just didn't get to that yet.
Personally I'd like to have tox.toml
anyway. Tox configurations may get quite complex and I tend to keep them in a separate file, just one in format with a (better) specification. Currently, tox configuration can be written in setup.cfg
, but I don't remember a single project where I would see that. From a contributor point of view, when I see tox.ini
I know that the project uses tox and I don't really have to look up how to run tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer to have an option of separate TOML config file as well. If you don't like a dedicated file such as tox.toml
, what about allowing to specify configuration file in env variable, such as TOX_CONFIG
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't like the environment idea 😃
I changed testenv in TOML to Currently supported pyproject.toml looks like [tool.tox]
env_list = ['py311', 'py312', 'type']
# The default testenv is `testenv`.
[tool.tox.env.testenv]
deps = 'pytest'
commands = ['pytest tests']
[tool.tox.env.type]
deps = 'mypy'
commands = ['mypy src'] I also added support for native I split I keep |
I think deps needs to be a list of strings. Also, I would like to rename the base environment name to something like testenv -> base. |
Ad options: deps = ["quality: ruff"] but that is somewhat clumsy and it really doesn't work with non-string options, such as I'm starting to think the best approach would be to provide a subkey to explicitly define factors in TOML, such as [[tox.deps]]
name = "ruff"
when = ["quality"]
[[tox.deps]]
name = "pip"
when = ["py312", "py311"]
[[tox.deps]]
name = "setuptools"
# or a shortcut of
[tox]
deps = ["ruff", "pip", "setuptools"]
# when none of the deps has custom factors. Ad base environment name: I tried to respect the |
IMHO we should do something similar to what hatch does for environment generation and factors. I am ok with having dedicated toml. |
@ziima do you plan to finalize this? |
I'm back from holiday, so I should be able to find some time to work on this again. |
Great to hear so. And thank you for doing all the hard work. |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Replaced by #3353 |
This is a prototype solution for #999, see discussion there.
This branch will be rebased a lot.