Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds support for skipping profiling if the Result is found in the checkpoint #191

Merged

Conversation

nv-braf
Copy link
Contributor

@nv-braf nv-braf commented Nov 22, 2024

This adds the code to allow us to skip profiling a configuration that we have checkpointed (in a previous run).

Add in the missing method to create a representation of the GAP config and then it is the combination of GAP + PA representations that are used to determine if a config was already profiled.

If so, we skip, else we create a new/unique configuration name (by incrementing the number suffix of the highest currently stored configuration in the Results).

@nv-hwoo
Copy link
Contributor

nv-hwoo commented Nov 26, 2024

Why does this PR contain changes made from previous PRs?

@nv-braf
Copy link
Contributor Author

nv-braf commented Nov 26, 2024

Why does this PR contain changes made from previous PRs?

Sorry about that!

Every Monday I pull and rebase the dev branch (analyze_subcommand_phase1) from main to ensure that there will be minimal conflicts when we eventually merge. Unfortunately, this means I need to also rebase any branches I have up for review (which I sometimes forget to do!)

Copy link
Contributor

@nv-hwoo nv-hwoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@nv-braf nv-braf merged commit e41c62c into analyze_subcommand_phase1 Nov 27, 2024
6 checks passed
@nv-braf nv-braf deleted the add_support_for_checkpoint_config_matching branch November 27, 2024 00:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants