Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

[Snyk] Security upgrade apollo-server from 2.25.3 to 2.25.4 #264

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: staging
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

baukef
Copy link

@baukef baukef commented Oct 15, 2022

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

merge advice

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 551/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF)
SNYK-JS-APOLLOSERVER-3043107
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: apollo-server The new version differs by 6 commits.
  • ae444b2 Release
  • 54879d0 Update OSS orb to pass --no-verify-access to lerna publish
  • 82d4498 Disable graphql-upload integration when it is not used (#6476)
  • c98507e Remove files from old Gatsby docs theme (v2) (#6216)
  • 628fbb7 Updates for new docs infra (v2) (#6210)
  • 41671ec docs: fix error on custom directives page (#6183)

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants