Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: sync server metrics #662

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

chore: sync server metrics #662

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

outerlook
Copy link
Contributor

@outerlook outerlook commented Oct 8, 2024

Description

During Grafana setup, some modifications were made to servers. This PR synchronizes what was performed with the repo.

Related Problem

just related to #415

How Has This Been Tested?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new internal metrics source to enhance monitoring capabilities.
    • Added transformations to manage log volume and filter internal metrics effectively.
  • Improvements

    • Renamed existing log source for clarity.
    • Updated metrics collection to include additional host metrics.

Include host source for host metrics in observer. Add throttling for Docker and kgw logs to reduce volume. Introduce internal metrics filtering to control metric usage and prevent excessive billing.
@outerlook outerlook self-assigned this Oct 8, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the vector-sources.yml configuration file, which includes the addition of a new internal metrics source, renaming an existing log source, updates to a metrics source collector, and the introduction of several transformations for log and metrics management. These transformations include throttling mechanisms for logs and filtering for internal metrics.

Changes

File Change Summary
deployments/observer/vector-sources.yml - Added new source: in-metrics-internal (type: internal_metrics)
- Renamed source: out-logs-dockerlogs-docker (type remains docker_logs)
- Updated out-metrics-hostmetrics to include host collector
- Modified cgroups section for proper indentation
- Added transformation: logs-docker-throttle (type: throttle, limits logs to one per ten seconds)
- Added transformation: out-logs-kgw-throttle (type: throttle, for kgw/middleware logs)
- Added transformation: out-metrics-internal-filter (type: filter, retains specific internal metrics)

Suggested reviewers

  • MicBun

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
New metrics dance, dispelling gloom.
Logs now throttle, steady and bright,
Filtering whispers in the night.
Hooray for updates, let’s hop and cheer,
A brighter future, drawing near! 🌼


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
deployments/observer/vector-sources.yml (4)

13-13: LGTM! Consider updating the comment for collectors.

The changes look good. Adding the 'host' collector will provide more comprehensive metrics about the host system. The modification in the 'cgroups' section improves the structure and readability of the configuration.

Consider updating the comment for collectors to reflect the current list:

collectors: # default are [cpu disk filesystem load host memory network cgroups]

Also applies to: 28-31


34-37: LGTM! Consider linking this source with its filter.

The addition of the in-metrics-internal source is good for collecting internal metrics. The warning comment is crucial to prevent potential performance issues.

Consider adding a comment that links this source to its corresponding filter (out-metrics-internal-filter) to make the relationship clearer:

in-metrics-internal:
  type: internal_metrics
  # This source is filtered by the 'out-metrics-internal-filter' transform

52-78: LGTM! Monitor the impact of new throttles.

The addition of logs-docker-throttle and out-logs-kgw-throttle transforms is a good approach to manage log volume. The exclusion conditions and throttle settings appear well-considered for their respective use cases.

Consider implementing monitoring for these throttles to ensure they're not overly aggressive:

  1. Track the number of throttled events vs total events.
  2. Monitor for any unexpected gaps in important log data.
  3. Be prepared to adjust the window_secs and threshold values based on observed behavior in production.

80-93: LGTM! Consider documenting metric selection rationale.

The addition of the out-metrics-internal-filter is crucial for managing internal metrics and controlling costs. The filter is well-implemented and correctly linked to the in-metrics-internal source.

Consider adding a brief explanation for why these specific metrics (component_discarded_events_total and component_errors_total) were chosen to be retained. This documentation will be valuable for future maintenance and understanding of the system's monitoring strategy.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7d209e and 54c3f86.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deployments/observer/vector-sources.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
deployments/observer/vector-sources.yml (1)

46-49: LGTM! Verify impact of source renaming.

The renaming of 'out-logs-docker' to 'logs-docker' improves naming consistency. However, ensure that all references to this source throughout the configuration have been updated accordingly.

Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old source name:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: 'out-logs-docker' successfully renamed to 'logs-docker'.

All references to 'out-logs-docker' have been updated accordingly with no remaining occurrences found in YAML files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to 'out-logs-docker'

# Test: Search for 'out-logs-docker' in all YAML files
rg --type yaml 'out-logs-docker'

Length of output: 32


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate all YAML files and search for 'out-logs-docker'

# Find all YAML files and search for 'out-logs-docker'
fd --extension yaml --type f | xargs rg 'out-logs-docker' --context 2

# Check the exit status
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
  echo "References to 'out-logs-docker' found. Please update them accordingly."
else
  echo "No references to 'out-logs-docker' found in YAML files."
fi

Length of output: 216

Copy link

pr-time-tracker bot commented Oct 8, 2024

@outerlook
⚠️⚠️⚠️
You must submit the time spent on this PR.
⚠️⚠️⚠️

@MicBun MicBun merged commit f660c53 into main Oct 9, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@MicBun MicBun deleted the chore/sync-metrics branch October 9, 2024 04:57
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants