fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.24.1

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
react-router (source)	6.19.0 -> 6.24.1
react-router-dom (source)	6.19.0 -> 6.24.1

---

Release Notes

remix-run/react-router (react-router)

v6.24.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• When using future.v7_relativeSplatPath, properly resolve relative paths in splat routes that are children of pathless routes (#​11633)
• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.24.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• Add support for Lazy Route Discovery (a.k.a. Fog of War) (#​11626)

  • RFC: https://togithub.com/remix-run/react-router/discussions/11113
  • unstable_patchRoutesOnMiss docs: https://reactrouter.com/en/main/routers/create-browser-router

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.23.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• allow undefined to be resolved with <Await> (#​11513)
• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.23.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• Add a new unstable_dataStrategy configuration option (#​11098)
  • This option allows Data Router applications to take control over the approach for executing route loaders and actions
  • The default implementation is today's behavior, to fetch all loaders in parallel, but this option allows users to implement more advanced data flows including Remix single-fetch, middleware/context APIs, automatic loader caching, and more

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.22.1: v6.22.1

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6221

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Fix bug with route.lazy not working correctly on initial SPA load when v7_partialHydration is specified (#​11121)
• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

  This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

  The Bug
  The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

  The Background
  This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

  <BrowserRouter>
    <Routes>
      <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
      <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Routes>
  </BrowserRouter>

  Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

  function Dashboard() {
    return (
      <div>
        <h2>Dashboard</h2>
        <nav>
          <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
          <Link to="team">Team</Link>
          <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
        </nav>
  
        <Routes>
          <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
          <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
          <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
        </Routes>
      </div>
    );
  }

  Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

  The Problem

  The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

  // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
  function DashboardTeam() {
    // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
    return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
  
    // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
    return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
  }

  We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

  Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

  <BrowserRouter>
    <Routes>
      <Route path="dashboard">
        <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
      </Route>
    </Routes>
  </BrowserRouter>

  Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

  Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

  let router = createBrowserRouter({
    path: "/dashboard",
    children: [
      {
        path: "*",
        action: dashboardAction,
        Component() {
          // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
          // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
          // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
          return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
        },
      },
    ],
  });

  This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

  The Solution
  If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

  <BrowserRouter>
    <Routes>
      <Route path="dashboard">
        <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
      </Route>
    </Routes>
  </BrowserRouter>
  
  function Dashboard() {
    return (
      <div>
        <h2>Dashboard</h2>
        <nav>
          <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
          <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
          <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
        </nav>
  
        <Routes>
          <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
          <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
          <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
        </Router>
      </div>
    );
  }

  This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

• Properly handle falsy error values in ErrorBoundary's (#​11071)
• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Revert the useResolvedPath fix for splat routes due to a large number of applications that were relying on the buggy behavior (see https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/issues/11052#issuecomment-1836589329). We plan to re-introduce this fix behind a future flag in the next minor version. (#​11078)
• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)

Patch Changes

• Fix bug with resolveTo in splat routes (#​11045)
  • This is a follow up to #​10983 to handle the few other code paths using getPathContributingMatches
  • This removes the UNSAFE_getPathContributingMatches export from @remix-run/router since we no longer need this in the react-router/react-router-dom layers
• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

remix-run/react-router (react-router-dom)

v6.24.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Remove polyfill.io reference from warning message because the domain was sold and has since been determined to serve malware (#​11741)
  • See https://sansec.io/research/polyfill-supply-chain-attack
• Export NavLinkRenderProps type for easier typing of custom NavLink callback (#​11553)
• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]
  • [email protected]

v6.24.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• Add support for Lazy Route Discovery (a.k.a. Fog of War) (#​11626)

  • RFC: https://togithub.com/remix-run/react-router/discussions/11113
  • unstable_patchRoutesOnMiss docs: https://reactrouter.com/en/main/routers/create-browser-router

Patch Changes

• Fix fetcher.submit types - remove incorrect navigate/fetcherKey/unstable_viewTransition options because they are only relevant for useSubmit (#​11631)
• Allow falsy location.state values passed to <StaticRouter> (#​11495)
• Updated dependencies:
  • [email protected]
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.23.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Check for document existence when checking startViewTransition (#​11544)
• Change the react-router-dom/server import back to react-router-dom instead of index.ts (#​11514)
• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]
  • [email protected]

v6.23.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• Add a new unstable_dataStrategy configuration option (#​11098)
  • This option allows Data Router applications to take control over the approach for executing route loaders and actions
  • The default implementation is today's behavior, to fetch all loaders in parallel, but this option allows users to implement more advanced data flows including Remix single-fetch, middleware/context APIs, automatic loader caching, and more

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]
  • [email protected]

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]
  • [email protected]

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]
  • [email protected]

v6.22.1

Compare Source

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• Include a window__reactRouterVersion tag for CWV Report detection (#​11222)

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]
  • [email protected]

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Fix NavLink isPending when a basename is used (#​11195)
• Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)
• Updated dependencies:
  • [email protected]

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • [email protected]
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

  This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

  The Bug
  The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

  The Background
  This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

  <BrowserRouter>
    <Routes>
      <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
      <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Routes>
  </BrowserRouter>

  Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

  function Dashboard() {
    return (
      <div>
        <h2>Dashboard</h2>
        <nav>
          <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
          <Link to="team">Team</Link>
          <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
        </nav>
  
        <Routes>
          <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
          <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
          <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
        </Routes>
      </div>
    );
  }

  Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

  The Problem

  The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

  // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
  function DashboardTeam() {
    // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
    return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
  
    // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
    return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
  }

  We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

  Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

  <BrowserRouter>
    <Routes>
      <Route path="dashboard">
        <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
      </Route>
    </Routes>
  </BrowserRouter>

  Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

  Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

  let router = createBrowserRouter({
    path: "/dashboard",
    children: [
      {
        path: "*",
        action: dashboardAction,
        Component() {
          // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
          // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
          // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
          return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
        },
      },
    ],
  });

  This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

  The Solution
  If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

  <BrowserRouter>
    <Routes>
      <Route path="dashboard">
        <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
      </Route>
    </Routes>
  </BrowserRouter>
  
  function Dashboard() {
    return (
      <div>
        <h2>Dashboard</h2>
        <nav>
          <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
          <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
          <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
        </nav>
  
        <Routes>
          <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
          <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
          <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
        </Router>
      </div>
    );
  }

  This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • @remix-run/[email protected]
  • [email protected]

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Revert the useResolvedPath fix for splat routes due to a large number of applications that were relying on the buggy behavior (see https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/issues/11052#issuecomment-1836589329). We plan to re-introduce this fix behind a future flag in the next minor version. (#​11078)
• Updated dependencies:
  • [email protected]
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies:
  • [email protected]
  • @remix-run/[email protected]

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[sweep-ai]

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

• Apply: All new business logic should have corresponding unit tests.
• Apply: Refactor large functions to be more modular.
• Apply: Add docstrings to all functions and file headers.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.