-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] UT "sectional-solid-horizontal" #468
base: development
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[WIP] UT "sectional-solid-horizontal" #468
Conversation
This definitely looks interesting. I see multiple separate issues that can be addressed:
Note: to screen shot just the active window, use |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see that the file is 4x1, so there can be no IfcAxis2PlacementLinear
- disregard that comment.
Check for existence of IfcSectionedSolidHorizontal
in the unit test code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where did we conclude here? Were there mistakes in the Ifc file?
Added new unit test "sectional-solid-horizontal" to check #463. Fixes #463 .
Redid analysis as in this issue in usBIM.viewer (on the left side of the screenshot) and OIP (on the right).

The former does not read the deck and railings.
OIP reads all the parts, but with wrong orientations and the rails are in incorrect shape.
Work in progress