Skip to content

Replication of Study 1A from Young & Saxe (2011, Cognition), examining the role of intent in moral judgments across harm, incest, and ingestion violations. Includes data, analysis scripts, and final report.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

ucsd-psych201a/young2011

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

48 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Replication of Study 1A by Liane Young and Rebecca Saxe (2011, Cognition)

Overview

This repository contains materials for the replication of Study 1A from Young & Saxe (2011), which investigates the role of intent in moral judgments across different moral domains. The study follows a 2 (intent: intentional vs. accidental) × 3 (domain: harm, incest, ingestion) between-subjects design.

Project Structure

├── data/                     # Raw and cleaned datasets
├── scripts/                  # R scripts for analysis and visualization
├── results/                  # Output files, figures, and summary statistics
├── Final_Project_Report.Rmd  # Main replication report in R Markdown
├── README.md                 # This file

Getting Started

Requirements

To reproduce the analysis, install the following R packages:

install.packages(c("tidyverse", "ggplot2", "car"))

Running the Analysis

  1. Download the repository: Clone using the command below or download manually.
    git clone https://github.com/ucsd-psych201a/young2011
  2. Load the dataset: The dataset is available in data/moral_judgment_data.csv.
  3. Run the scripts:
    • Data cleaning: scripts/data_cleaning.R
    • ANOVA analysis: scripts/anova_analysis.R
    • Visualization: scripts/plot_results.R
  4. Generate the final report:
    • Run Final_Project_Report.Rmd in RStudio or use:
      rmarkdown::render("Final_Project_Report.Rmd")

Results Summary

  • Harm vs. Incest: Significant intent × domain interaction (p < 0.05), replicating original findings.
  • Incest vs. Ingestion: No significant interaction (p > 0.05), consistent with prior work.
  • Harm vs. Ingestion: Significant difference (p < 0.05), reinforcing harm-purity distinction.

Contributors

Citation

If using this work, please cite:

Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains. Cognition, 120(2), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.005

License

This project is released under the MIT License.

About

Replication of Study 1A from Young & Saxe (2011, Cognition), examining the role of intent in moral judgments across harm, incest, and ingestion violations. Includes data, analysis scripts, and final report.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published