-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
First reconciliation PR from production/RRFS.v1 #226
First reconciliation PR from production/RRFS.v1 #226
Conversation
…nd it will be consistent with convective precipitation"
5b27a47
to
14afff2
Compare
@@ -4118,7 +4119,7 @@ subroutine cup_output_ens_3d(xff_mid,xf_ens,ierr,dellat,dellaq,dellaqc, & | |||
,intent (inout) :: & | |||
ierr,ierr2,ierr3 | |||
integer, intent(in) :: dicycle | |||
real(kind=kind_phys), intent(in), dimension (its:ite) :: xf_dicycle | |||
real(kind=kind_phys), intent(in), dimension (its:ite) :: xf_dicycle, rrfs_factor | |||
!$acc declare copyin(zu,pwd,p_cup,sig,xmbm_in,xmbs_in,edt,xff_mid,dellat,dellaqc,dellaq,pw,ktop,xland1,xf_dicycle) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe irrelevant, but if xf_dicycle is part to the $acc directive, should rrfs_factor be added?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dustinswales If this caused a problem, do you think that this type of thing would be caught in the SCM nvhpc CI test? Just curious. I.e. is this something that the compiler would catch or would it just be a run-time issue (failure or performance hit)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no clue if this would get caught at buildtime/runtime.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I approve the changes in RUC LSM.
Tests are done at ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#2449. @rhaesung @dustinswales can you merge this pr? |
Contains the original PR from @haiqinli for the production/RRFS.v1 branch:
#176
on top of the latest ufs/dev branch.
Note that the changes to drag_suite.F90 have been superceded by changes already in ufs/dev.