-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add qqZZ sample for HIG-PODAS exercise #17
base: podas
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @bonanomi , this looks great! Just some very minor comments here.
As discussed privately, I'll get on requesting a transfer of this and the signal sample in the near future. Thanks again for the work!
cmsdb/processes/ewk.py
Outdated
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ | |||
zz_llll = zz.add_process( | |||
name="zz_llll", | |||
id=8130, | |||
xsecs={13: Number(0.1)}, # TODO | |||
xsecs={13: Number(1.256)}, # TODO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this the XS of XS(ZZ)*BR(Z->ll)**2
? Might be good to write this out, or even have a look if e.g. the BR(Z->ll) is already part of the constants
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this should be already xsec*BR. If we want to be 1:1 with the main HZZ analysis, we should consider adding the k-factors in the cf
example to normalize this xsec to the NNLO one, but for the scope of the exercise this should be irrelevant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hi @pkausw done in this commit
@bonanomi Is this PR still desired / alive, or did the POG exercise use your fork in the end? |
Just to comment: The PODAS exercise used this specific branch in the end. Nevertheless, since we want to repurpose the exercise for the columnflow demo, it might be interesting to merge these samples into cmsdb so we can always use the latest and greatest version in the demo. What do you think? |
Sounds good. Then we should just merge after the above comment is resolved. |
No description provided.