2023postBPix campaign #56
Conversation
mafrahm
force-pushed
the
campaign/2023_postBPix
branch
from
e03b2af to
fa051aa
Compare
| ), | ||
| ), | ||
| ) | ||
| # cpn.add_dataset( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are the following datasets commented out? Is there something wrong with them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is nothing wrong with the datasets, but the corresponding processes have not yet been implemented
| # cpn.add_dataset( | ||
| # name="h_ggf_htt_amcatnlo", | ||
| # id=14920389, | ||
| # processes=[procs.h_ggf_htt], | ||
| # info=dict( | ||
| # nominal=DatasetInfo( | ||
| # keys=[ | ||
| # "/GluGluHto2Tau_M-125_TuneCP5_13p6TeV_amcatnloFXFX-pythia8/Run3Summer23BPixNanoAODv12-130X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_postBPix_v2-v2/NANOAODSIM", # noqa | ||
| # ], | ||
| # n_files=28, | ||
| # n_events=984768, | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| # cpn.add_dataset( | |
| # name="h_ggf_htt_amcatnlo", | |
| # id=14920389, | |
| # processes=[procs.h_ggf_htt], | |
| # info=dict( | |
| # nominal=DatasetInfo( | |
| # keys=[ | |
| # "/GluGluHto2Tau_M-125_TuneCP5_13p6TeV_amcatnloFXFX-pythia8/Run3Summer23BPixNanoAODv12-130X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_postBPix_v2-v2/NANOAODSIM", # noqa | |
| # ], | |
| # n_files=28, | |
| # n_events=984768, | |
| # ), | |
| # ), | |
| # ) |
| # cpn.add_dataset( | ||
| # name="h_vbf_htt_powheg", | ||
| # id=14927460, | ||
| # processes=[procs.h_vbf_htt], | ||
| # info=dict( | ||
| # nominal=DatasetInfo( | ||
| # keys=[ | ||
| # "/VBFHTo2TauUncorrelatedDecay_M-125_TuneCP5_13p6TeV_powheg-pythia8/Run3Summer23BPixNanoAODv12-130X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_postBPix_v2-v2/NANOAODSIM", # noqa | ||
| # ], | ||
| # n_files=21, | ||
| # n_events=200000, | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ) | ||
| # cpn.add_dataset( | ||
| # name="h_vbf_htt_powheg", | ||
| # id=14927786, | ||
| # processes=[procs.h_vbf_htt], | ||
| # info=dict( | ||
| # nominal=DatasetInfo( | ||
| # keys=[ | ||
| # "/VBFHTo2TauUncorrelatedDecay_Filtered_M-125_TuneCP5_13p6TeV_powheg-pythia8/Run3Summer23BPixNanoAODv12-130X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_postBPix_v2-v2/NANOAODSIM", # noqa | ||
| # ], | ||
| # n_files=71, | ||
| # n_events=7065031, | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't be either one of these uncommented? I'm guessing the second one, though there are quite a few filters applied on LHE level (see fragment). In any case, it's good to know what the Filtered refers to.
Side note: I'm not sure if we can use the "normal" XS prediction for this sample though, so the first (unfiltered) one might be what we want after all...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have no preference which of these datasets to keep and which to remove. There is also the UncorrelatedDecay part present in the DAS name, so maybe both of these datasets are not what we want. In 2017 for example, there is this dataset, which does not include that part at all:
"/VBFHToTauTau_M125_TuneCP5_13TeV-powheg-pythia8/RunIISummer20UL17NanoAODv9-106X_mc2017_realistic_v9-v1/NANOAODSIM"
| # cpn.add_dataset( | ||
| # name="zh_htt_powheg", | ||
| # id=14927596, | ||
| # processes=[procs.zh_htt], | ||
| # info=dict( | ||
| # nominal=DatasetInfo( | ||
| # keys=[ | ||
| # "/ZHto2TauUncorrelatedDecay_M-125_CP5_13p6TeV_powheg-minnlo-pythia8/Run3Summer23BPixNanoAODv12-130X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_postBPix_v2-v2/NANOAODSIM", # noqa | ||
| # ], | ||
| # n_files=26, | ||
| # n_events=29949, | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ) | ||
| # cpn.add_dataset( | ||
| # name="zh_htt_powheg", | ||
| # id=14927498, | ||
| # processes=[procs.zh_htt], | ||
| # info=dict( | ||
| # nominal=DatasetInfo( | ||
| # keys=[ | ||
| # "/ZHto2TauUncorrelatedDecay_Filtered_M-125_CP5_13p6TeV_powheg-minnlo-pythia8/Run3Summer23BPixNanoAODv12-130X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_postBPix_v2-v2/NANOAODSIM", # noqa | ||
| # ], | ||
| # n_files=230, | ||
| # n_events=1009433, | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ), | ||
| # ) |
Co-authored-by: Mathis Frahm <[email protected]>
2023 hh2bbtautau, hhh4b2tau, data samples
should be merged after #49