Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export project interactions #7433

Closed
wants to merge 22 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

paulgain
Copy link
Contributor

@paulgain paulgain commented Dec 23, 2024

Description of change

A feature branch for export projects interactions:

Test instructions

Checklist

  • Has the branch been rebased to main?
  • Automated tests (Any of the following when applicable: Unit, Functional or End-to-End)
  • Manual compatibility testing (Browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari)

@paulgain paulgain requested a review from a team as a code owner December 23, 2024 05:56
Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 23, 2024

data-hub-frontend    Run #59139

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #59139  •  git commit f1bfbba32e: Export project interactions `Sort by` functionality (#7500)
Project data-hub-frontend
Branch Review feature/export-project-interactions
Run status status check passed Passed #59139
Run duration 01m 38s
Commit git commit f1bfbba32e: Export project interactions `Sort by` functionality (#7500)
Committer E De Los Reyes
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 15
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 69.56522% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.54%. Comparing base (e4b0ea2) to head (2641753).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ent/modules/ExportPipeline/ExportDetails/index.jsx 63.15% 7 Missing ⚠️
...es/ExportPipeline/ExportInteractionsList/index.jsx 12.50% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7433      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.57%   88.54%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1144     1146       +2     
  Lines       17789    17805      +16     
  Branches     5097     5098       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        15756    15766      +10     
- Misses       2033     2039       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@paulgain paulgain force-pushed the feature/export-project-interactions branch from 63b8282 to 5dc592f Compare December 27, 2024 17:07
@dredmonds dredmonds self-assigned this Jan 29, 2025
@dredmonds dredmonds added the WIP label Jan 29, 2025
@dredmonds dredmonds force-pushed the feature/export-project-interactions branch from f49e4e4 to 2641753 Compare February 5, 2025 14:17
* Layout test scenarios - Sort export project interaction list

Sort a default company export interaction list

* Added test coverage for company export interaction

* Added export interaction collection list test

* Update sandbox server `/v4/export/:exportId` endpoint error response

* Fix export interaction tab navigation failing test

* Moved a constant functions declaration

Is a best practice to declare constant functions in the beginning of the codebase before calling, in order the javascript interpreter can locate.
This action being reverted and noted as part of flakiness/tech debt.

* Use interaction `subject` rather than export `title`

Amend the current implementation of export interaction list by using `subject` rather than export interaction `title` on the list because is already on the header and repetitive each details .
@cgsunkel
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as @dredmonds has opened a new PR for this

@cgsunkel cgsunkel closed this Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants