Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UAT Release #2161

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

UAT Release #2161

merged 13 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

Tllew
Copy link
Contributor

@Tllew Tllew commented Sep 2, 2024

Merge Dev into UAT

Tllew and others added 13 commits August 22, 2024 13:25
Currently we are using CLEs from Good when displaying them on the
licence document. Usually this will be the same as recorded in
GoodOnApplication but if the underlying good is re-used in other
applications where it is assessed differently then they both
will differ. In such cases we will be displaying these values
from both the assessments.

Fix this by using the entries from GoodOnApplication.

Add test to ensure correct values are displayed.
LTD-5356: Display CLEs assessed for this application on the licence document
…-name-fix

same as previous commit but good name
@Tllew Tllew changed the title Dev into UAT UAT Release Sep 2, 2024
@Tllew Tllew merged commit b5f523a into uat Sep 2, 2024
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants