Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: more type annotations #122

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2024
Merged

feat: more type annotations #122

merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2024

Conversation

michalc
Copy link
Member

@michalc michalc commented May 25, 2024

This still isn't a complete set - strict type annotation won't work, but hopefully a step forward. The set of annotations is slightly arbitrary.

Inspired by the discussion at #120

Meta: Deciding that this is more a 'feat' than a 'refactor' in terms of the commit message. While it's not a runtime behaviour change, it is a de-facto change of the API

This still isn't a complete set - strict type annotation won't work, but
hopefully a step forward. The set of annotations is slightly arbitrary.

Inspired by the discussion at
#120

Meta: Deciding that this is more a 'feat' than a 'refactor' in terms of the
commit message. While it's not a runtime behaviour change, it is a de-facto
change of the API
@michalc michalc merged commit d9d79b4 into main May 25, 2024
5 checks passed
@michalc michalc deleted the feat/more-type-annotations branch May 25, 2024 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant