rebuild data type

[lwaekfjlk]

Closes #69

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed
• Branch name follows type/descript (e.g. feature/add-llm-agents)
• Ready for code review

ℹ Additional Information

[chengzr01]

All the tests have passed on my end, including mypy and pytest. I think now the code is ready for merge. Since the Pydantic package can only be used for data validation, I have commented all of the code trying to specify an index parameter in Field (Documentation: https://docs.pydantic.dev/dev/api/fields/). Maybe we can use another ORM package to specify the indices of the database in the future.

[lwaekfjlk]

All the tests have passed on my end, including mypy and pytest. Since the Pydantic package can only be used for data validation, I have commented all of the code trying to specify an index parameter in Field (Documentation: https://docs.pydantic.dev/dev/api/fields/). Maybe we need another ORM package to specify the indices of the database in the future.

Oh, yes, definitely. We just commented out those. Sorry I forget about this.

[lwaekfjlk]

@chengzr01 Thanks, let me review and merge this.

[chengzr01]

All the tests have passed on my end, including mypy and pytest. Since the Pydantic package can only be used for data validation, I have commented all of the code trying to specify an index parameter in Field (Documentation: https://docs.pydantic.dev/dev/api/fields/). Maybe we need another ORM package to specify the indices of the database in the future.

Oh, yes, definitely. We just commented out those. Sorry I forget about this.

No worries!

[chengzr01]

@chengzr01 Thanks, let me review and merge this.

Sounds great! Also thank you for your great efforts!

[lwaekfjlk]

@timsanders256 part of the submit env needs further modification