-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ultralytics Refactor https://ultralytics.com/actions #41
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR refactors code to improve performance and readability by optimizing various functions, simplifying complex logic, removing redundant code, and improving code structure and organization. Sequence diagram for GitHub Actions workflow with Ultralytics formattingsequenceDiagram
participant GH as GitHub Workflow
participant UA as Ultralytics Action
participant Fmt as Formatters
GH->>UA: Run with token
Note over UA: Use GITHUB_TOKEN or _GITHUB_TOKEN
UA->>Fmt: Apply formatting
Note over Fmt: - Python code & docstrings<br/>- YAML, JSON, Markdown, CSS
UA->>GH: Apply labels to issues/PRs
UA->>GH: Submit formatted changes
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
👋 Hello @glenn-jocher, thank you for submitting this
If your PR is related to a bug fix and does not already include a Minimum Reproducible Example (MRE), kindly provide one to help us understand and validate the issue. For further guidance, you can refer to our Contributing Guide. If you have any concerns or questions, feel free to leave a comment. Thank you for your contributions to Ultralytics! An engineer will review your PR soon. 🙌🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @glenn-jocher - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- The PR description does not match the actual changes. Please update the description to focus on the specific change being made (adding a token fallback) rather than generic refactoring claims and marketing links.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
🎉 Hey @glenn-jocher, your PR has been merged—thank you for enhancing the robustness of our GitHub Actions workflow! 🛠️✨ Your thoughtful improvements ensure smoother collaboration for everyone involved. As Marcus Aurelius once said, “What stands in the way becomes the way.” Your fix turned potential obstacles into opportunities for more resilient processes. 🌟 Every detail you refine helps build a stronger, more reliable foundation for all contributors. Onward and upward! 🚀 |
This Ultralytics PR refactors code to improve performance and readability. 🔄
Key changes include:
These changes aim to enhance the overall quality and efficiency of the code. 🌟
Learn more about Ultralytics:
Summary by Sourcery
CI:
_GITHUB_TOKEN
orGITHUB_TOKEN
secret.🛠️ PR Summary
Made with ❤️ by Ultralytics Actions
🌟 Summary
Improved GitHub Actions formatting workflow by adjusting the token handling.
📊 Key Changes
format.yml
workflow to use a fallback mechanism for GitHub tokens by replacing${{ secrets._GITHUB_TOKEN }}
with${{ secrets._GITHUB_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
.🎯 Purpose & Impact
_GITHUB_TOKEN
is unavailable by falling back to the standardGITHUB_TOKEN
.