We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Noticed we've go a few different case types going on here:
aws s3 ls "s3://pipeline-prod-cache-503977275616-ap-southeast-2/byob-icav2/production/analysis/"
PRE bclconvert-interop-qc/ PRE cttsov2/ PRE tumor_normal/ PRE umccrise/ PRE wgtsQc/
Should tumor_normal instead be 'tumor-normal' and wgtsQc be `wgts-qc'?
tumor_normal
wgtsQc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
All in favour.
Sorry, something went wrong.
While at it, would be great if you could harmonise workflow_name (equivalent of type_name from Portal Workflow table) there too.
workflow_name
type_name
This is also related to object store output path^ prefix.
Something similar like SecondaryAnalysisHelper harmonisation or etc would be great.!
alexiswl
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Noticed we've go a few different case types going on here:
Should
tumor_normal
instead be 'tumor-normal' andwgtsQc
be `wgts-qc'?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: