feat(auction) msgs interfaces and validation #2475
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates involve modifications to the auction system in a blockchain protocol. A specific field related to revenue collection has been removed from reward parameters, and the type for bid amounts in auction bids has been switched to a custom type for better representation. Additionally, new utility functions for number checking have been introduced, alongside tests for these functions and auction-related messages, enhancing validation and efficiency in the system. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/auction/auction.pb.gois excluded by:!**/*.pb.gox/auction/tx.pb.gois excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (6)
- proto/umee/auction/v1/auction.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/umee/auction/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- util/checkers/number.go (1 hunks)
- util/checkers/number_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/auction/msgs.go (1 hunks)
- x/auction/msgs_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- proto/umee/auction/v1/auction.proto
Additional comments: 11
proto/umee/auction/v1/tx.proto (1)
- 46-46: The change from
cosmos.base.v1beta1.Cointocosmossdk.io/math.Intfor thebid_amountfield inMsgRewardsBidis noted. Ensure that the new type is consistently used across the system and is well-documented to avoid confusion.x/auction/msgs.go (2)
- 21-30: The implementation of
ValidateBasicandGetSignersforMsgGovSetRewardsParamscorrectly uses the new validation checkers and aligns with best practices for message validation in the SDK.- 42-58: The implementation of
ValidateBasicandGetSignersforMsgRewardsBideffectively uses the new validation checkers for comprehensive input validation, adhering to SDK standards.x/auction/msgs_test.go (2)
- 13-42: The tests for
MsgGovSetRewardsParamsare comprehensive, covering a range of scenarios to ensure the message's validation logic works as expected. The use oft.Parallel()for parallel test execution is a good practice.- 44-74: The tests for
MsgRewardsBideffectively validate the message's validation logic under various scenarios, ensuring robustness. The consistent use oft.Parallel()enhances test execution efficiency.util/checkers/number.go (3)
- 30-35: The
NumberMinfunction correctly checks if a number meets a specified minimum value, enhancing validation capabilities. The implementation is generic and the error message is clear.- 37-42: The
NumberPositivefunction effectively ensures a number is positive, contributing to the system's robust validation mechanisms. The implementation is generic, making it versatile for various use cases.- 44-46: The
BigNumPositivefunction extends validation capabilities to complex numeric types with anIsPositivemethod, ensuring versatility in validation checks. The implementation is clear and the error message is appropriate.util/checkers/number_test.go (3)
- 98-127: The tests for
NumberPositiveandBigNumPositiveare comprehensive, covering a range of scenarios to ensure the validation functions work as expected. The consistent use oft.Parallel()enhances test execution efficiency.- 129-147: The tests for
NumberMineffectively validate the function's ability to check minimum values under various scenarios, ensuring robustness. The consistent use oft.Parallel()enhances test execution efficiency.- 33-39: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [12-90]
The inclusion of
t.Parallel()in all tests contributes to the efficiency of the test suite, ensuring that the validation logic is thoroughly tested across various scenarios.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/auction/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/auction/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (5)
- proto/umee/auction/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/umee/auction/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- util/coin/fixtures.go (1 hunks)
- x/auction/msgs.go (1 hunks)
- x/auction/msgs_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- proto/umee/auction/v1/tx.proto
- x/auction/msgs.go
- x/auction/msgs_test.go
Additional comments (4)
proto/umee/auction/v1/genesis.proto (4)
- 21-21: The addition of the
highest_bidderfield withcosmos.AddressStringscalar type is correctly implemented and follows protobuf conventions.- 22-22: The
highest_bidfield is correctly defined using thecosmos.base.v1beta1.Cointype and is appropriately marked as non-nullable.- 25-25: The
current_rewardsfield is correctly defined as a repeated field ofcosmos.base.v1beta1.Coinand is non-nullable, following protobuf best practices for representing multiple coin types.- 28-29: The
next_rewardsandcurrent_rewards_auction_endfields are correctly defined with their respective types and marked as non-nullable. The use ofgogoproto.stdtimefor the timestamp field is a good practice.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2475 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.38% 69.25% -6.14%
==========================================
Files 100 189 +89
Lines 8025 10968 +2943
==========================================
+ Hits 6050 7596 +1546
- Misses 1589 2742 +1153
- Partials 386 630 +244
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- util/coin/fixtures.go (1 hunks)
- x/auction/msgs_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/auction/msgs_test.go
| // Umee creates a BondDenom sdk.Coin with the given amount | ||
| func Umee(amount int64) sdk.Coin { | ||
| return sdk.NewInt64Coin(umee, amount) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Umee function correctly creates a sdk.Coin with the umee denomination. However, it's important to ensure that new functions are covered by tests to verify their correctness and behavior under various conditions.
Consider adding unit tests for the Umee function to cover different amounts, including edge cases.
| // UmeeCoins creates an Umee (uumee) sdk.Coins with the given amount | ||
| func UmeeCoins(amount int64) sdk.Coins { | ||
| return sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewInt64Coin(umee, amount)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The UmeeCoins function correctly creates sdk.Coins with the umee denomination. As with any new functionality, it's crucial to have test coverage to ensure the function behaves as expected under various scenarios.
Consider adding unit tests for the UmeeCoins function, focusing on different amounts and edge cases.
Description
Summary by CodeRabbit