Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(auction): finalize events #2525

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

feat(auction): finalize events #2525

merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

robert-zaremba
Copy link
Member

Description

@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba added the skip-e2e-test Skip the e2e tests label May 15, 2024
@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2024 14:16
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates streamline the auction module in the Umee project. Key changes include the removal of the rewards field from the EventRewardsAuctionResult message in the events.proto file, a refined comment for the RewardsAuction RPC in query.proto, and the addition of event emission in the FinalizeRewardsAuction function within rewards.go, leveraging the sdkutil library.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
proto/umee/auction/v1/events.proto Removed the rewards field from the EventRewardsAuctionResult message.
proto/umee/auction/v1/query.proto Updated comment for the RewardsAuction RPC to clarify it returns current reward auction info.
x/auction/keeper/rewards.go Imported sdkutil and added event emission for EventRewardsAuctionResult in FinalizeRewardsAuction.

🐇 In code's vast field, we pruned and refined,
Events more clear, with purpose aligned.
Auctions now sing with streamlined grace,
Rewarding the devs who set the pace.
Emit the changes, watch them flow,
In Umee's garden, let progress grow. 🌱


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a32c546 and 815f442.
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • x/auction/events.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go, !**/*.pb.go
  • x/auction/query.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go, !**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (3)
  • proto/umee/auction/v1/events.proto (1 hunks)
  • proto/umee/auction/v1/query.proto (1 hunks)
  • x/auction/keeper/rewards.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • proto/umee/auction/v1/query.proto
Additional comments not posted (3)
proto/umee/auction/v1/events.proto (1)

Line range hint 8-12: The rewards field has been removed from the EventRewardsAuctionResult message. Ensure that all references to this field have been removed or updated in the codebase to prevent any runtime errors.

Verification successful

The rewards field has been successfully removed from the EventRewardsAuctionResult message in proto/umee/auction/v1/events.proto, and no references to this field remain in the codebase.

  • The EventRewardsAuctionResult message now only contains id and bidder fields.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that there are no references to the removed `rewards` field in the codebase.

# Test: Search for references to the `rewards` field in the codebase. Expect: No matches.
rg --type proto 'repeated cosmos.base.v1beta1.Coin rewards'

Length of output: 91



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that there are no references to the removed `rewards` field in the codebase.

# Test: Search for references to the `rewards` field in the codebase. Expect: No matches.
rg 'repeated cosmos.base.v1beta1.Coin rewards'

Length of output: 450



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the `EventRewardsAuctionResult` message from `proto/umee/auction/v1/auction.proto` to verify the removal of the `rewards` field.

# Test: Extract the `EventRewardsAuctionResult` message definition.
rg -A 10 'message EventRewardsAuctionResult' proto/umee/auction/v1/auction.proto

Length of output: 82



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the `EventRewardsAuctionResult` message definition across all `.proto` files to verify the removal of the `rewards` field.

# Test: Search for the `EventRewardsAuctionResult` message definition.
rg 'message EventRewardsAuctionResult' --type proto

Length of output: 83



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the `EventRewardsAuctionResult` message definition across all files to verify the removal of the `rewards` field.

# Test: Search for the `EventRewardsAuctionResult` message definition.
rg 'message EventRewardsAuctionResult'

Length of output: 111



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the `EventRewardsAuctionResult` message from `proto/umee/auction/v1/events.proto` to verify the removal of the `rewards` field.

# Test: Extract the `EventRewardsAuctionResult` message definition.
rg -A 10 'message EventRewardsAuctionResult' proto/umee/auction/v1/events.proto

Length of output: 403

x/auction/keeper/rewards.go (2)

14-14: The import statement for sdkutil is necessary for emitting the EventRewardsAuctionResult event. This change is appropriate.


37-40: The EventRewardsAuctionResult event is emitted correctly using sdkutil.Emit. Ensure that the id and bidder fields are correctly populated and that the event emission logic aligns with the intended auction finalization process.

Verification successful

The EventRewardsAuctionResult event is emitted correctly using sdkutil.Emit, with the id and bidder fields properly populated.

  • The id field is directly assigned.
  • The bidder field is correctly converted to a string using sdk.AccAddress(bid.Bidder).String().
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `id` and `bidder` fields are correctly populated in the `EventRewardsAuctionResult` event.

# Test: Search for the `FinalizeRewardsAuction` function to ensure the correct population of event fields. Expect: Correct population of `id` and `bidder`.
rg --type go 'func FinalizeRewardsAuction' -A 20

Length of output: 50



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and implementation of the `FinalizeRewardsAuction` function.

# Test: Search for the `FinalizeRewardsAuction` function to ensure the correct population of event fields. Expect: Correct population of `id` and `bidder`.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func FinalizeRewardsAuction($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 74



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and implementation of the `FinalizeRewardsAuction` function and inspect the `rewards.go` file.

# Test 1: Search for the `FinalizeRewardsAuction` function to ensure the correct population of event fields. Expect: Correct population of `id` and `bidder`.
rg 'func FinalizeRewardsAuction' -A 20

# Test 2: Inspect the `rewards.go` file for the event emission logic. Expect: Correct population of `id` and `bidder`.
rg 'sdkutil.Emit' x/auction/keeper/rewards.go -A 10

Length of output: 407

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 62.81%. Comparing base (7f05ad4) to head (7dc7445).
Report is 475 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2525       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   75.38%   62.81%   -12.58%     
===========================================
  Files         100      275      +175     
  Lines        8025    15870     +7845     
===========================================
+ Hits         6050     9968     +3918     
- Misses       1589     5130     +3541     
- Partials      386      772      +386     
Files Coverage Δ
x/auction/keeper/rewards.go 26.21% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 237 files with indirect coverage changes

@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba enabled auto-merge May 15, 2024 14:38
@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba added this pull request to the merge queue May 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 695c641 May 15, 2024
20 of 26 checks passed
@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba deleted the robert/auction-events branch May 15, 2024 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-e2e-test Skip the e2e tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants