2024-concurrency-and-parallelism

[arber-hyseni]

No description provided.

[tri2820]

Hi @arber-hyseni , this PR contains 4 file changes. A PR should contain only 2 file changes (the markdown article and the illustration image). Please update your branch to reflect this.

[arber-hyseni]

Hi @arber-hyseni , this PR contains 4 file changes. A PR should contain only 2 file changes (the markdown article and the illustration image). Please update your branch to reflect this.

Fixed this

---

REVISED: Based on Feedback 2b

[evos96]

External feedback:

Part of participants that are computer science students/graduates: 47 %

Part of participants that would read the booklet if it was not for this survey: 70 %

Clarity of the article:

• Very clear: 76 %
• Clear: 12 %
• Not clear: 12 %

Technical vs. Non-technical:

• Good balance between technical depth and readability: 94 %
  The article was too technical: 6 %

Engagement:

• I stayed engaged throughout: 76 %
• I lost interest midway: 24 %

Structure of the article:

• The structure is clear and easy to follow: 94 %
• The structure was confusing: 6 %

Part of participants that understand the purpose of the article: 70 %

Part of participants that think the drawing helps to understand the meaning of the article: 59 %

Factual errors/inaccuracies or additional comments:

• no

[carinaschrenk]

Internal Feedback Round 2B 28.11

Thoughts

• Not more text neeeded, good length
• "Concurrency is like being a solo barista" -> metaphor does not fit properly

Ideas

• Mention that concurrency is powerful but dangerous

Two general comments from today:

Just because something is listed in the feedback, does not mean you have to implement it.
This list is simply a collection of everything mentioned in the seminar and might even contain conflicting opinions.
You as the author still have the freedom to not make certain suggested changes.

Second, a general comment today was, that the articles of 2024 are quite technical and complex in comparison to 2019.
We could all strive to make our articles more simple and understandable to the general public.
Not every technical term needs to be mentioned and explained.