Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2024-actions-and-consequences-the-science-of-robot-learning #142

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

subahini
Copy link
Collaborator

round 2 article

@tri2820 tri2820 changed the title Actions and consequences science of robot learning 2024-actions-and-consequences-the-science-of-robot-learning Nov 21, 2024
@tri2820
Copy link
Collaborator

tri2820 commented Nov 21, 2024

Hi @subahini, this PR contains 3 file changes. A PR should contain only 2 files (the markdown article and the illustration image). Please update your branch to reflect this.

Also, if the folder name is in all_lower_case or with-hyphen that would be great.

@carinaschrenk carinaschrenk added the 2024: round 2 articles of round 2 label Nov 21, 2024
@ShamanOxy
Copy link
Collaborator

External feedback:

Part of participants that are computer science students/graduates: 44.4 %
Part of participants that would read the booklet if it was not for this survey: 33.3 %

Clarity of the article:

Very clear: 44.4 %
Clear: 55.6 %
Not clear: 0 %

Technical vs. Non-technical:

Good balance between technical depth and readability: 100 %
The article was too technical: 0 %

Engagement:

I stayed engaged throughout: 88.9 %
I lost interest midway: 11.1 %

Structure of the article:

The structure is clear and easy to follow: 100 %
The structure was confusing: 0 %

Part of participants that understand the purpose of the article: 77.8 %

Factual errors/inaccuracies or additional comments:

The text is well written and easy to understand.

@carinaschrenk
Copy link
Collaborator

carinaschrenk commented Nov 29, 2024

Internal Feedback Round 2B-google-poll 28.11

Thoughts

  • Article is short/precise/to the point (x3)
  • Article is good/I like the article (x4)
  • Text feels like a definition not an explanation
  • Pawlow/reinforcement learning must be mentioned (x2)

  • Illustration missing (x3)
  • Ensure that an illustration directly supports the explanation for better comprehension

Ideas

  • Pavlov's experiment MUST be mentioned here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning), the dog can serve as an element in the picture.
  • Adding a practical example (e.g., training a robot to navigate a maze or teaching an AI to play a game) would make the concept more tangible. (x3)
  • A sentence referring to machine learning can be good too, as the reader might not know what reinforcement learning is used for

Two general comments:

Just because something is listed here, does not mean you have to implement it.
You as the author still have the freedom to not make certain suggested changes.
This list is simply a collection of everything commented in the google poll.
I tried to structure the comments and merge similar ones and count how often this point was mentioned.
If a comment says "I think", this is not me (Carina), but someone who commented on the poll.

Second, a general comment on the 28.11 was, that the articles of 2024 are quite technical and complex in comparison to 2019.
We could all strive to make our articles more simple and understandable to the general public.
Not every technical term needs to be mentioned and explained.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Deploying tilics with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: bb80776
Status:🚫  Build failed.

View logs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants