Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2024-symmetric-vs-asymmetric-cryptography #151

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ajorian
Copy link
Collaborator

@Ajorian Ajorian commented Nov 26, 2024

round 3 article

@Ajorian Ajorian added the 2024: round 3 articles of round 3 label Nov 26, 2024
@carinaschrenk carinaschrenk changed the title added the article:symmetric-vs-asymmetric-cryptography 2024-symmetric-vs-asymmetric-cryptography Dec 3, 2024
@carinaschrenk
Copy link
Collaborator

Internal Feedback Round 3A 05.12

Thoughts

  • Symmetric cryptography is not really simpler than asymmetric
  • The article has a lot of definitions and is too much like a lecture slide and not enough like an article

Ideas

  • Focus on asymmetric cryptography
    • it was believed in the seventies that you could only have decryption by sharing a secret

@liuchengray
Copy link
Collaborator

External feedback:

Part of participants that are computer science students/graduates: 56 %
Part of participants that would read the booklet if it was not for this survey: 56 %

Clarity of the article:

  • Very clear: 50 %
  • Clear: 25 %
  • Not clear: 25 %

Technical vs. Non-technical:

Good balance between technical depth and readability: 38 %
The article was too technical: 62 %

Engagement:

  • I stayed engaged throughout: 62 %
  • I lost interest midway: 38 %

Structure of the article:

  • The structure is clear and easy to follow: 90 %
  • The structure was confusing: 10 %

Part of participants that understand the purpose of the article: 90 %

Part of participants that think the drawing helps to understand the meaning of the article: 50 %

Factual errors/inaccuracies or additional comments:

NO COMMENTS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2024: round 3 articles of round 3
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants