Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Putting GHEs downstream of the buildings #677

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Putting GHEs downstream of the buildings #677

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

JingWang-CUB
Copy link
Collaborator

@JingWang-CUB JingWang-CUB commented Nov 19, 2024

Any background context you want to provide?

This PR changes the couplings to put GHEs downstream of the buildings in the same building group.
Before:
image
After:
image

What does this PR accomplish?

It also changes the time series building template to take heat pump heating COP from the sys_params file.

How should this be manually tested?

poetry run any tests with GHEs and buildings.

What are the relevant tickets?

Issue #675 and issue #666.

Screenshots (if appropriate)

@JingWang-CUB JingWang-CUB marked this pull request as draft November 19, 2024 17:20
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ within {{ project_name }}.Loads.{{ model_name }};
"Model of a building with an internal ETS. Building loads provided as time series"
extends Buildings.DHC.Loads.Combined.BaseClasses.PartialBuildingWithETS(
final allowFlowReversalSer=true,
{% endraw %}redeclare {{ project_name }}.Loads.{{ model_name }}.TimeSeriesBuilding bui(
{% endraw %}COPHeaWat_nominal={{data['cop_heating']}},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this COPHeaWat_nominal get used in this model, or another model? Was it being automatically set and now we're explicitly setting it, and the usage is already written?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It gets used in every model with a 5G ETS model. We were using the MBL default values before and now we take the user-defined value from the sys_params file.

@vtnate vtnate marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2024 17:11
Copy link
Contributor

@vtnate vtnate left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🥳

@vtnate vtnate merged commit f70eadb into develop Nov 25, 2024
10 checks passed
@vtnate vtnate deleted the ghe_downstream branch November 25, 2024 17:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants