Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[frontend] Fix redirect issue after signin by using router.replace from client component #246

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

usatie
Copy link
Owner

@usatie usatie commented Feb 7, 2024

#237

  • signin時にServer ActionからredirectするとNavBarが更新されない
  • (signout時にはNavBarも更新される)
  • Server Actionからの返り値をもとに、Client Componentからrouter.replaceすることで対応した

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@usatie has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 408c7a4 and d4fa13b.

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve modifying the authentication process in a web application. Instead of redirecting users from the server-side after successful authentication, the application now marks them as "Authenticated" and leverages client-side navigation to refresh the page or redirect users. This approach utilizes the router.refresh method from a client-side component, ensuring a smoother user experience during the login process.

Changes

Files Change Summary
frontend/.../actions.ts Updated the authenticate function to return "Authenticated" instead of redirecting.
frontend/.../login-form.tsx Imported useRouter and added client-side redirect logic based on the code state value.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import { Card, CardContent, CardHeader, CardTitle } from "@/components/ui/card";
import { Input } from "@/components/ui/input";
import { Label } from "@/components/ui/label";
import { useFormState, useFormStatus } from "react-dom";
import { useRouter } from "next/navigation";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure that the import path for useRouter is correct. The correct import path from Next.js is "next/router", not "next/navigation".

- import { useRouter } from "next/navigation";
+ import { useRouter } from "next/router";

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
import { useRouter } from "next/navigation";
import { useRouter } from "next/router";

Comment on lines 30 to 33
const router = useRouter();
if (code === "Authenticated") {
router.replace("/");
}
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Feb 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The redirection logic based on the code state value is correctly implemented. However, consider adding a dependency array to a useEffect hook to avoid potential issues with this logic executing more than once or at an unintended time.

+ import { useEffect } from 'react';
+ 
+ useEffect(() => {
+   if (code === "Authenticated") {
+     router.replace("/");
+   }
+ }, [code, router]);

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
const router = useRouter();
if (code === "Authenticated") {
router.replace("/");
}
import { useEffect } from 'react';
useEffect(() => {
if (code === "Authenticated") {
router.replace("/");
}
}, [code, router]);

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since it's going to redirect, there is no way this code is going to be executed twice?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@takumihara: You're correct that in this specific case, the redirection should ideally only occur once due to the nature of the navigation action. However, wrapping the redirection logic in a useEffect hook with [code, router] as dependencies is a best practice in React development. It ensures that the effect runs exactly once when the code state changes to "Authenticated", providing a safeguard against potential unexpected re-renders before the navigation completes. This approach enhances the predictability and maintainability of the code, especially in more complex applications where state changes and effects might interact in less straightforward ways. It's about adhering to best practices that help prevent subtle bugs in larger, more complex scenarios.

Comment on lines +66 to +70
// This is a temporary fix for the redirect issue. It seems that the redirect is not working as expected.
// Instead of redirecting from server action, router.refresh from client component is used.
// Maybe this is related?: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/58263
// redirect('/', 'layout');
return "Authenticated";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove commented-out code if it's no longer needed to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.

-  // This is a temporary fix for the redirect issue. It seems that the redirect is not working as expected.
-  // Instead of redirecting from server action, router.refresh from client component is used.
-  // Maybe this is related?: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/58263
-  // redirect('/', 'layout');

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
// This is a temporary fix for the redirect issue. It seems that the redirect is not working as expected.
// Instead of redirecting from server action, router.refresh from client component is used.
// Maybe this is related?: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/58263
// redirect('/', 'layout');
return "Authenticated";
return "Authenticated";

@usatie usatie merged commit cedea6c into main Feb 7, 2024
4 checks passed
@usatie usatie deleted the feat/frontend/refresh-after-signin branch February 7, 2024 05:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants